So....not read 24 pages...what's the craic then? What's the consensus....SISU/CCFC to win or CCC/ACL to win?
WJK
Consensus? This is skybluestalk!
Seems like one view is everything in court will be factual and that’s what will be important, not the judgement. Other view seems to be the judgement is what matters and other info in court will be PR. So take your choice from the following!
CCFC website says transcripts and the key points from the case at the end of each day will be posted on the website and will include the arguments from both the club and the council, will be un-edited in order for fans to get a clear understanding of the facts.
Rob S on here says “This won’t be so much about the decision that Justice Hickinbottom arrives at as the information that gets read into court. Sure, a decision on whether the council acted within state aid regulations will be useful and could have an effect on resolving this dispute but the main event will be hearing what is read into court re: emails & documents between the various parties connected to ACL.
Simon Gilbert on twitter says phrase on ccfc website is interesting because not everything presented in court is "fact".
Jack Griffin on here says: “it is about the judgement & the judgement only, much of the " information that gets read into court." is basically going to be PR. It is simply not the right way to use the courts if the object of the exercise is to push "a message"
