Do You Believe that Some of the Wilson Money Will Be Reinvested in the Team? (1 Viewer)

[skybluepm2]

Frequently read 'Threads' but most just aren't worth the time and energy of a response but this 'Thread' takes the biscuit!

In hindsight, it probably isn't worth the time and energy in any of us responding to you but perhaps if you just get the message that you are a prize bell end then we will stop.

 

---

[shmmeee]

Question

If the sale of Wilson was crucial to having any sort of budget and helps SISU sit tight at Sixfields for the next 12 months with the business breaking even ...... when exactly was the decision taken to sell him? :thinking about:

A more cynical man would say the valuation put on him early on was based more on need than his value.

Also: who puts a figure on a player who "isn't for sale"? We were basically putting a release clause on him.

 

[wingy]

Looks like the pot Is getting bigger .

Seems we're due some monies If Juke completes his move to Burnley.

 

[martcov]

[

only if supporters turn-up to support the manager and our team help!

If only the manager and team would turn up in coventry, then i am sure the supporters would come.

Quote=ccfc92;734856]i always took sisu covering losses as we wouldn't need to sell players to stay in the same position we are.

Surely the money coming in lately (arsenal, lc, cw, christie) should push us towards building the club?

[/quote]

 

[shmmeee]

Looks like the pot Is getting bigger .

Seems we're due some monies If Juke completes his move to Burnley.

No mention of how much in the Telegraph article. What's the normal figure for these deals? 10-20%?

Could be enough to push us into a profit this year.

 

[wingy]

No mention of how much in the Telegraph article. What's the normal figure for these deals? 10-20%?

Could be enough to push us into a profit this year.

It just suggests the potential to rise to £2.3M.

Don't know why but i was under the impression we got less than a Million at the time.

 

[oldskyblue58]

There is a note in the 2013 SBS&L accounts that identifies a contingent asset that the club will receive £450k under transfer agreements, these sums are dependent on various potential achievements by the player and the club they are now employed by. Perhaps that's it? or the amount we will get will be part of the £450k

 

[skybluetom]

Define reinvest?

It'll be used to against whatever deficit the club us running this season, wages basically. We may see one or two players signings for nominal fees, but nothing substantial in terms of transfer fees.

 

[ccfc92]

Building the Club would be Retaining players such as Wilson ,not moving to a ground no one wants and dropping £3M of revenues you tool.[/QUOTE]

Not sure who that was aimed at, but I meant say we were at the Ricoh, and all these monies came in, that should be reinvested into the playing side to progress, not keep afloat?

 

[ccfc92]

[

Only if supporters turn-up to support the manager and our team HELP!


QUOTE=ccfc92;734856]I always took SISU covering losses as we wouldn't need to sell players to stay in the same position we are.

Surely the money coming in lately (Arsenal, LC, CW, Christie) should push us towards building the club?

[/QUOTE]


Please separate this quote appropriately. The bold bit is my post.