Trust the Trust + kcic is taking a break! (41 Viewers)

[cloughie]

You lot are pathetic

just waiting to pick holes in anything that someone who does so much with the club and fans in mind.

If only some could be so busy to pick holes against our impeccable owners

Shame the nit pickers can't do something to help the club we fans have lost instead of propping up a failed regime

 

---

[WestEndAgro]

Tell me about it. The way some were falling over themselves to justify it was hilarious.

As is the justification for attending xxxx fields

 

[martcov]

Where have 88% said the offer should be accepted? Do 88% think ACL should now accept sisu's offer?

Probably not. TF is hoping that the Council - taxpayers - want the club back enough and put pressure on ACL to accept. I doubt whether 88% of taxpayers are in favour of giving in to the kidnappers demands. TF has sent the proposal to the FL to show he is trying. But the attitude is all wrong.

 

[Grendel]

Probably not. TF is hoping that the Council - taxpayers - want the club back enough and put pressure on ACL to accept. I doubt whether 88% of taxpayers are in favour of giving in to the kidnappers demands. TF has sent the proposal to the FL to show he is trying. But the attitude is all wrong.

So why would 88% accept kcic's offer? Are you saying that the £590,000 did not have to be paid in this offer? Why would 88% if taxpayers want that offer?

 

[MichaelCCFC]

So why would 88% accept kcic's offer? Are you saying that the £590,000 did not have to be paid in this offer? Why would 88% if taxpayers want that offer?

As per another thread - no trolling, flaming or winding up!!!

 

[Nick]

As per another thread - no trolling, flaming or winding up!!!

Michael, there is a bit of a difference isn't there? If you do find those questions insulting then feel free to report them.

If I am reading it wrong and he is insulting you personally in that post then just drop me a PM and I can sort it.

 

[Grendel]

As per another thread - no trolling, flaming or winding up!!!

I think its fair to ask how you calculated 88% supported the offer. Do you wish to answer how 88% was derived at? Was the £590,000 part of the offer given ACL will not negotiate if not paid?

I actually give up. How that's trolling defeats me. Surely your post is trolling unless you have answers?

 

[Nick]

Wasn't there a CET poll?

 

[Grendel]

Wasn't there a CET poll?

Who knows? Who cares? For the very first time i am selecting the ignore option. I'm out.

 

[shmmeee]

Where have 88% said the offer should be accepted? Do 88% think ACL should now accept sisu's offer?

http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/vote-should-coventry-city-owners-7299265

As for 2 dunno, set a poll up. But from the comments I've seen on articles, I seriously doubt it.

 

[mark82]

As per another thread - no trolling, flaming or winding up!!!

Huh?

 

[shmmeee]

Huh?

Really?

 

[fernandopartridge]

I maybe wrong but I think NW comment was more about NOPM and the Arsenal game, rather than your comment of being divisive.

I.e. staunch NOPM, not buying away tickets from the club so that they don't get the £1.50 booking fee, not buying any merchandise, etc, etc. building a rigid viewpoint....then we draw arsenal away.....

....and that rigid staunch NOPM viewpoint is amended to enable them to go to the match.

I think he was just pointing out that in that scenario the previously staunch NOPMers left themselves open to having stick. And tang the NOPM should have been a more flexible standpoint from the start...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

Aye remember all that shite. "Can you buy from the x ticket office" nonsense. Hypocritical.

 

[skybluetony176]

You lot are pathetic

just waiting to pick holes in anything that someone who does so much with the club and fans in mind.

If only some could be so busy to pick holes against our impeccable owners

Shame the nit pickers can't do something to help the club we fans have lost instead of propping up a failed regime

And the same nit pickers then wonder why they get called sisu apologists and take offence from it.


Enjoy your break Michael, you've earned it.

You've taken on a responsibility that no football fan should ever have been in a position where it was needed It's just a shame some people don't have the common sense to realise that before they start nic picking.

 

[mark82]

Really?

Admittedly not read the whole thread but not sure how the bit Michael quoted was trolling or winding up.

 

[Nick]

And the same nit pickers then wonder why they get called sisu apologists and take offence from it.


Enjoy your break Michael, you've earned it.

You've taken on a responsibility that no football fan should ever have been in a position where it was needed It's just a shame some people don't have the common sense to realise that before they start nic picking.

I think most people respect the time he puts in but because they question they don't lack common sense do they? Or should everybody just agree?

 

[letsallsingtogether]

Michael is our hero he has succeeded where all others have failed :claping hands:

Who knows? Who cares? For the very first time i am selecting the ignore option. I'm out.

 

[skybluetony176]

I think most people respect the time he puts in but because they question they don't lack common sense do they? Or should everybody just agree?

Like the post i was replying to. It's a shame that they don't do the same nit picking of our owners and their offers.

 

[Grendel]

Really?

I thought you were in the 12% from the comments at the time.

 

[skybluefred]

I do not operate a NOPM or KCIC theme because somebody who does not act on my behalf and who I have no interest in told me to.

I do it and will continue to do it until our Football Club is returned to it's rightful home--the Ricoh Arena & Coventry City.
By that I mean within the City boundaries.

I do it because the move away was totally wrong and immoral and should never have been permitted by the Football League.

So for me it's NOPM & KCIC & sisu out.

 

[Nick]

Like the post i was replying to. It's a shame that they don't do the same nit picking of our owners and their offers.

As said, are the owners on here posting about them?

 

[skybluetony176]

As said, are the owners on here posting about them?

Are you seriously nieve enough to assume that our owners don't read this forum?

 

[cloughie]

I thought you were in the 12% from the comments at the time.

Thought you were out .........especially as the 88% proof was proven

yet more quotes where you cannot be taken taken seriously.


do us all a favour and stick to your word for once 'your out'

 

[Nick]

Are you seriously nieve enough to assume that our owners don't read this forum?

Hence I said post?

On a side note, I am glad Michael is having a break and should chill out for a bit.

 

[letsallsingtogether]

Of course they do otherwise how did they get users off this site to go to their meetings and anyway Tim told us personally that he doesn't but they have people that do?

And if Tim said he doesn't read them who am I to distrust him.:thinking about:

One or two are probably posters same as ACL?

Are you seriously nieve enough to assume that our owners don't read this forum?

 

[Nick]

Of course they do otherwise how did they get users off this site to go to their meetings and anyway Tim told us personally that he doesn't but they have people that do?

And if Tim said he doesn't read them who am I to distrust him.:thinking about:

One or two are probably posters same as ACL?

They got their PR company to contact me for the one we went to to ask for my details. Nothing on here.

They could have people posting, none are proven or confirmed though like the ACL ones.

 

[skybluetony176]

Hence I said post?

On a side note, I am glad Michael is having a break and should chill out for a bit.

So we shouldn't discuss anything that's not posted on here by the club then? Sort of defeats the point of the site doesn't it Nick.

 

[letsallsingtogether]

So they must read it is what I'm saying or they wouldn't have contacted you.

Plus a certain poster I/we know really well was asked for personally.

They got their PR company to contact me for the one we went to to ask for my details. Nothing on here.

They could have people posting, none are proven or confirmed though like the ACL ones.

 

[The Gentleman]

As said, are the owners on here posting about them?

Fair enough Nick, but lets just say that Sisu were on here, what questions would you ask them about their latest non offer (until it's offered it's yet more words from an already untrustworthy bunch) ? I know it's going slightly off topic but don't they all.

 

[skybluetony176]

They got their PR company to contact me for the one we went to to ask for my details. Nothing on here.

They could have people posting, none are proven or confirmed though like the ACL ones.

Apart from PWKH

 

[Nick]

So we shouldn't discuss anything that's not posted on here by the club then? Sort of defeats the point of the site doesn't it Nick.

Seriously? I am not sure how I can put it simpler.

Michael comes on here and posts, hence people ask questions as he is here posting about it. If Tim Fisher was on here posting, I am pretty sure he would get a lot worse

 

[Nick]

So they must read it is what I'm saying or they wouldn't have contacted you.

Plus a certain poster I/we know really well was asked for personally.

Yes of course they read it, I have never said they don't

 

[Nick]

Apart from PWKH

Yeah maybe

 

[skybluetony176]

Fair enough Nick, but lets just say that Sisu were on here, what questions would you ask them about their latest non offer (until it's offered it's yet more words from an already untrustworthy bunch) ? I know it's going slightly off topic but don't they all.

And to add to that Joys name was taken of that statement so you can't even say with any certainty that she supports it. Sounds like another hand shake gate to me.

But there's no point discussing it as the club don't post on here.

Does that mean no more pointless discussions about the squad or the score? Because the club don't post on here Nick?

 

[Nick]

And to add to that Joys name was taken of that statement so you can't even say with any certainty that she supports it. Sounds like another hand shake gate to me.

But there's no point discussing it as the club don't post on here.

Does that mean no more pointless discussions about the squad or the score? Because the club don't post on here Nick?

I think you are either missing the point totally or being a bit awkward.

Michael is asked questions on here, because he posts on here . The club aren't asked questions on here because they don't post on here so it would be pointless no?