mark82
Super Moderator
It's a ridiculous argument that is factually incorrect anyway. Not sire why you persist in replying time and again to the same people who just don't get it.
Trust the Trust + kcic is taking a break! (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter MichaelCCFC
- Start date
It's a ridiculous argument that is factually incorrect anyway. Not sire why you persist in replying time and again to the same people who just don't get it.
rondog1973
Well-Known Member
...and your going to object to playing in Northampton by attending Sixfields on a regular basis....
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Melodramatic rubbish
Nick
Administrator
Can't remember ever saying that I am staging a protest by going and then labelling it as a protest to say no to it?
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Doesn't mean you shouldn't question what the club and it's owner's are saying and doing. Again, otherwise what is the point of this site.
Some just don't want to question sisu while questioning everyone with an opposing view to sisu. It's that simple as I see it.
Last edited:
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Being melodramatic is the most important quality of a football fan. Why else would you ever go and watch some grown men kick a ball around without it.
Nick
Administrator
Why would I ask somebody a question when you know they aren't going to answer? Surely half of the stuff doesn't even need to be said, just because some people put "SISU are bad" in every thread even if it is to do with the weather it doesn't mean others don't think it?
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Why would you go to a football match when you don't know if your team is going to win? Did you get the answers from Michael when you were repeatedly asking them? Didn't stop you repeatedly asking them though did it?
Some would say that's a touch of double standards.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Never said you did. All I'm saying is they read it and if their so called PR company were any good they would get them to answer these questions...
Then again not very good with answers if it is not about slagging and discrediting other people.
All CCC fault
All ACL Fault
All Bings fault
All Elliots fault
All Higgs fault
You were there Nick that is all ML had to say fuckin waste of 3 hours listening to that Mong and his we tried everything and SISU will win JR 100% bullshit.
Did he actually answer any of our questions I got lost after the first 5 minutes and I was late.
Then again not very good with answers if it is not about slagging and discrediting other people.
All CCC fault
All ACL Fault
All Bings fault
All Elliots fault
All Higgs fault
You were there Nick that is all ML had to say fuckin waste of 3 hours listening to that Mong and his we tried everything and SISU will win JR 100% bullshit.
Did he actually answer any of our questions I got lost after the first 5 minutes and I was late.
Yes of course they read it, I have never said they don't
L
limoncello
Guest
Maybe because you like football? Why on earth would you consider melodrama an important part of being a football fan? You really are clueless.
rondog1973
Well-Known Member
Yep, on form as always. This is right up there with your best drivel.
Nick
Administrator
Erm I go to a football match because I enjoy going to games whether we win or lose (although not as much if we lose).
What is double standards about me asking Michael questions on threads he posts? Why aren't you asking Michael to answer fans questions to show SISU how it should be done, after all it pisses people off that SISU never talk to the fans right?
Would double standards not be the only defence against any questions that "it is ok because SISU do it but we dont like them doing it but it is michael so it is ok" or would it be ok the snotty PM's about solicitors I get because I dare to disagree while they are getting outraged about SISU threatening city fans? Would double standards not be moaning that SISU don't answer questions and not answering them?
I have openly said on here many a time that SISU are full of shit, yet Michael acts like them and is a hero which is confirmed because the only thing people can say when he gets asked a question is "why should he do this, SISU don't" which is encouraging him to act the same as SISU, one of the things people hate about them. (Including me).
What is double standards about me asking Michael questions on threads he posts? Why aren't you asking Michael to answer fans questions to show SISU how it should be done, after all it pisses people off that SISU never talk to the fans right?
Would double standards not be the only defence against any questions that "it is ok because SISU do it but we dont like them doing it but it is michael so it is ok" or would it be ok the snotty PM's about solicitors I get because I dare to disagree while they are getting outraged about SISU threatening city fans? Would double standards not be moaning that SISU don't answer questions and not answering them?
I have openly said on here many a time that SISU are full of shit, yet Michael acts like them and is a hero which is confirmed because the only thing people can say when he gets asked a question is "why should he do this, SISU don't" which is encouraging him to act the same as SISU, one of the things people hate about them. (Including me).
Nick
Administrator
Does that translate to you not having an actual answer?
Happy for you to find a post where I said that I go to Sixfields to emphasise how wrong it is and to say no to it?
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Hi ya bitter lemon. Good to hear from you as always.
So you don't think melodrama is part of the attraction of football. Funny that I've seen grown men who can hold it together at a loved ones funeral cry like a baby when a goal is scored in a football match.
Nick
Administrator
Yep and I agree, their PR is awful and it was a waste of time and I switched off and watched the game that was on TV. Arsenal I think.
Mainly because it was like a spinning class.
L
limoncello
Guest
No, that's being emotional. Melodrama is a pejorative term but if you want to claim it for your kind of football fan, go you.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I think it's sisu not listening to fans that pisses fans off, hence they went ahead with moving the club to Northampton.
I think Michael has listened to the vast majority of fans, hence the empty stadium in Northampton.
Has Michael got it right every time. No, but then Michael doesn't do what he's been doing for his day job. Like I said earlier, no fan should ever find themselves in a position where they feel that they need to do what Michael has taken on. Given that he's not a professional he's done well to get the majority right.
Have sisu and their associated companies got it right every time. No, given that running the club is their day job can you tell me the last commercial decision they made that has benefited the club? I'm struggling.
rondog1973
Well-Known Member
No, it translates as not having a clue to what you are attempting to get across.
You made a snide remark and gave an example which suggested you thought it was hypocritical.
I gave a response that suggested your Sixfields stance draws similar parallels and you come up with some evasive poppycock.
Unless that is you don't object to Northampton?
Nick
Administrator
I want us to be playing in Coventry, my point is that I am not using me going to Sixfields and then saying that I am going to prove a point it is wrong like the OP suggests, I have never once said I am going but using it as a protest. I go just to watch a football match, nothing more or nothing less, I am not trying to justify it by saying it is any sort of protest.
If I refused to go to MK Dons because I didn't agree with moving clubs and thought it was all completely wrong but then went to Sixfields then you would probably have a point, but then if you did I would just say I am only going to "say no to it". Some may say I am consistent with no morals
Evasive? I am quoting from the original post? Nothing is being evaded.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Well your total and utter refusal to answer any questions on it kind of gives that view credence...
And yes, before someone else says it, so does the total lack of detail from SISU about their 'offer' to ACL.
What's good for the goose and all that.
rondog1973
Well-Known Member
So how on Earth does any of that draw parallels with the McDonalds example you gave?I want us to be playing in Coventry, my point is that I am not using me going to Sixfields and then saying that I am going to prove a point it is wrong like the OP suggests, I have never once said I am going but using it as a protest. I go just to watch a football match, nothing more or nothing less, I am not trying to justify it by saying it is any sort of protest.
If I refused to go to MK Dons because I didn't agree with moving clubs and thought it was all completely wrong but then went to Sixfields then you would probably have a point, but then if you did I would just say I am only going to "say no to it". Some may say I am consistent with no morals
Evasive? I am quoting from the original post? Nothing is being evaded.
Yours mystified.
TheOldFive
New Member
I'm more SISU OUT than KCIC myself, the longer we stay at Northampton the more Sisu suffer - if they get back to the Ricoh in any way they will have won and we will never rid themselves of their evil spiteful money grabbing ways. Don't support anything that lets them sneak back into The Ricoh in charge. We need to be patient and endure this short term pain for long term gain. I know it's hard but it's the only way and the exile is the only thing that hurts Sisu. This is no time for conciliation, please keep up the agitation.
Nick
Administrator
Because of the oRiginal post, you know where it says that they will go to mk to say no to franchise football. Hence I said going to mcdonalds (maybe not a good example for meat) to say no to eating meat.
rondog1973
Well-Known Member
And the point I'm making is you gave an example which exposes the hypocrisy of your own stance of playing in Northants.
Nick
Administrator
As I said, where have I said I go to sixfields as a protest against it? Where have I put on a thread that I'm going to go to sixfields to say no to franchise football etc.
If I posted that I refuse to go to mk dons because i disagree with clubs being moved but then went to sixfields you would be correct.
rondog1973
Well-Known Member
No, no, no!
Nevermind the franchise bollocks! The bigger picture is, using your example, if you don't agree with something, don't do it.
Thus, if you don't agree with killing animals for meat, don't consume a Big Mac.
If you don't agree with your football club being moved to another location, don't pissing go there.
Easy eh?
Nick
Administrator
No, my example was referring to the bit about going to mk as a protest about franchise football? Hence the protest against meat being eating a big mac. (But refusing to go to burger king because they serve meat).
My point is more if you want to protest about something, don't protest by doing exactly what you are protesting about. My point wasn't about agreeing, it was about protesting....
I don't like sixfields, I go to watch football, I'm not on here constantly saying how much I hate mk dons etc and people who move clubs and then go to sixfields.
I am also not saying i like it.
rondog1973
Well-Known Member
You gotta larf!No, my example was referring to the bit about going to mk as a protest about franchise football? Hence the protest against meat being eating a big mac. (But refusing to go to burger king because they serve meat).
My point is more if you want to protest about something, don't protest by doing exactly what you are protesting about. My point wasn't about agreeing, it was about protesting....
I don't like sixfields, I go to watch football, I'm not on here constantly saying how much I hate mk dons etc and people who move clubs and then go to sixfields.
I am also not saying i like it.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Nick I to love watching Coventry but in my home town. I am forced to watch my team play away.
Coventry is not yet a franchise team.When it becomes one I will move on, and like the true Wimbledon fans support an AFC side a it will not be the team I started supporting as a kid.
So to use MK Dons as an example is complete bollox.
Coventry is not yet a franchise team.When it becomes one I will move on, and like the true Wimbledon fans support an AFC side a it will not be the team I started supporting as a kid.
So to use MK Dons as an example is complete bollox.
No, my example was referring to the bit about going to mk as a protest about franchise football? Hence the protest against meat being eating a big mac. (But refusing to go to burger king because they serve meat).
My point is more if you want to protest about something, don't protest by doing exactly what you are protesting about. My point wasn't about agreeing, it was about protesting....
I don't like sixfields, I go to watch football, I'm not on here constantly saying how much I hate mk dons etc and people who move clubs and then go to sixfields.
I am also not saying i like it.
Nick
Administrator
I didn't, the op did when they said by going it is saying no to franchise football.
Maybe all these slogans, reasons and catchy crap should scrapped and it should just be called going to watch the team you love play?
Succeeded in setting the club against the fans and fans against fans with constant agitatition, position changing and pointless publicity seeking and posturing. I give it about a week before he is back spewing more cockeyed bullshit.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Where as you'll never stop.
Cant stop giving Tony
