If a return was announced.... (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter ccfc92
- Start date
hill83
Well-Known Member
Yep. If a return was 100% confirmed, even for say something like February I'd go. It would have to be 100% confirmed though.
The reason i don't go is because I feel it is wrong that we are there and going is delaying a return. But a confirmation and a date would change that and I'd be on the piss in Northampton instantly.
Obviously is this dream world me going wouldn't make them change their mind and keep us in Northampton.
The reason i don't go is because I feel it is wrong that we are there and going is delaying a return. But a confirmation and a date would change that and I'd be on the piss in Northampton instantly.
Obviously is this dream world me going wouldn't make them change their mind and keep us in Northampton.
Last edited:
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
hill83
Well-Known Member
Play the game. In reality I'd be very wary, but this is a 'confirmed' scenario.
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
Otis
Well-Known Member
TF's blood dried on the contract
I'd need to see the body and his black heart encased in a lead capsule.
Show me that, then I might re-consider
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
Not even sure I will return even if we started at the Ricoh I am one of the ones who has found other things to do.
Kingokings204
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't go and just because it's confirmed doesn't make sixfields right.
We are ONLY there due to sisu wanting to pick the Ricoh on the cheap and selling at a profit which in turn has fucked the fans over bigtime and caused emotions never known to us before.
For these reasons some fans won't come back even to the Ricoh unless sisu go.
So to answer no I wouldn't go to sixfields if confirmed but I would go back to the Ricoh even if sisu are owners.
We are ONLY there due to sisu wanting to pick the Ricoh on the cheap and selling at a profit which in turn has fucked the fans over bigtime and caused emotions never known to us before.
For these reasons some fans won't come back even to the Ricoh unless sisu go.
So to answer no I wouldn't go to sixfields if confirmed but I would go back to the Ricoh even if sisu are owners.
Otis
Well-Known Member
Fair point. Sisu asked us to go to Sixfields because it would only be temporary. Well, 3-4 games to be played at Sixfields would still be part of that same scenario wouldn't it?
They've always promised to come back to the Coventry area (guess there is a bone of contention for some with the 'area' bit and that could have some bearing). Think I would just wait until we came back to be honest. In my eyes it was totally wrong to play at Sixfields and it will still be wrong for those 3-4 games.
Kingokings204
Well-Known Member
Yes that last sentance of yours Otis is spot on.
Hobo
Well-Known Member
.... but we missed the first few "home" games, say 3 or 4, would more people attend Sixfields?
Or would those that don't go, still stay away and wait til we return to the Ricoh?
100% definite return, and purely hypothetical
No...we shouldn't be playing at Sixfields I will attend on a return to Coventry the city the club represent.
italiahorse
Well-Known Member
NO
No need to be there other than Sisu want us there.
The Ricoh is ready and waiting for the first game.
No need to be there other than Sisu want us there.
The Ricoh is ready and waiting for the first game.
WONDERLAMPS
Well-Known Member
What is the point in this thread
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
skybluepm2
Well-Known Member
He has a heart?!
Mr T - Sukka!
Active Member
We need new owners before i go watch CCFC again. I cannot stand SISU and feel stabbed in the back by the move away. That was just to distress ACL. And totally said it all to me about their motives.
And i feel lied to about the new stadium, the list goes on and on.
I cannot control anyone elses decisions but my £ is going nowhere near them.
And i feel lied to about the new stadium, the list goes on and on.
I cannot control anyone elses decisions but my £ is going nowhere near them.
WONDERLAMPS
Well-Known Member
Ok. Enjoy fishing on Saturdays
Mr T - Sukka!
Active Member
Houchens Head
Fairly well known member from Malvern
Another poll................ (yawn)
Otis
Well-Known Member
This is SBT. This is Poll Central, Polll World!
| Man: | Well, what've you got? |
| Waitress: | Well, there's finance and tactics; finance, rumour and tactics, rumour and poll; finance and poll; tactics, rumour and poll; finance, rumour and poll; poll tactics, rumour and poll; poll, finance, poll, poll, rumour and poll; poll, tactics, poll, poll, rumour and poll, poll,; poll, tatics, poll, trolling and poll; |
| Vikings: | poll, poll, poll, poll, poll... |
| Waitress: | ...poll, poll, poll, finance and poll; poll, poll, poll, poll, poll, poll, attendances, poll, poll, poll, poll... |
| Vikings: | Poll! Lovely polls! Lovely polls! |
| Waitress: | ...or Lobster Fisher with a Seppala sauce served in a Provencale manner with an ACL and council garnished with truffle pate, brandy and with a fried egg on top and poll. |
| Wife: | Have you got anything without poll? |
| Waitress: | Well, there's poll, finance, tactics and poll, that's not got much poll in it. |
| Wife: | I don't want ANY polls! |
| Man: | Why can't she have finance, tactics, poll and rumour? |
| Wife: | THAT'S got poll in it! |
| Man: | Hasn't got as much poll in it as poll, finance, rumour and poll, has it? |
| Vikings: | Poll, poll, poll, poll ... (Crescendo through next few lines...) |
| Wife: | Could you do the finance, rumour, poll and tactics without the poll then? |
| Waitress: | Urgghh! |
| Wife: | What do you mean 'Urgghh'? I don't like polls! |
| Vikings: | Lovely polls! Wonderful polls! |
| Waitress: | Shut up! |
| Vikings: | Lovely polls! Wonderful polls! |
| Waitress: | Shut up! (Vikings stop) Bloody Vikings! You can't have finance, rumour, poll and tactics without the poll. |
| Wife: | I don't like polls! |
| Man: | Sshh, dear, don't cause a fuss. I'll have your polls. I love them. I'm having poll, poll, poll, poll, poll, poll, poll. attendances, poll, poll, poll, poll and poll! |
| Vikings: | Poll, poll, poll, poll, poll. Lovely polls! Wonderful polls! |
| Waitress: | Shut up!! Attendances are off. |
| Man: | Well could I have her poll instead of the attendances then? |
| Waitress: | You mean poll. poll. poll, poll, poll, poll, poll, poll, poll, poll, poll, poll... (but it is too late and the Vikings drown her words) |
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Just an off hand question. Nothing sinister. Simple yes or no
Where's the maybe option?!?:slap:
Otis
Well-Known Member
Well, yep, there is a prinicipal of not playing in Coventry, but for me it is has also always been about accessibility and not being able to get there for kick offs anyway.
Last edited:
RegTheDonk
Well-Known Member
No, I feel its wrong to play home games outside of Cov.
Plus, I know it's a "what if" poll, supposedly 100% definite return, but the question itself implys do we trust them to actually follow through. A contract means nothing to these people, who's to say we would return home even if papers were signed.
Plus, I know it's a "what if" poll, supposedly 100% definite return, but the question itself implys do we trust them to actually follow through. A contract means nothing to these people, who's to say we would return home even if papers were signed.
LJC_CCFC
Well-Known Member
Otis
Well-Known Member
Took about 3 mins to replace all the 'spams' with 'polls.'
Covstu
Well-Known Member
Dont think i could do it, even if it was 100% confirmed. We are there for a reason and people wont attend on principles, all because we would go back to the Ricoh at one point doesnt make it right. I think the biggest question is that if we returned how many would turn up!