skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Interestingly the councillors were banging on about the Ricoh always being planned as a two franchise sport development.
Also the council have a curious obsession with property development hence their pathetic attempt to fawn over Haskell.
Other ex board members have stated the council demanding the club build hotels and other complexes in return for the ground.
So I suspect matching the actual bid would still have meant no
Curios obsession with property development. I would think regeneration of the city would be part of their duty to the city not a curious obsession. Unless of course you believe that the Ricoh site should still be an abandoned Gas Works?
The club wouldn't have built jack. Just attracted the right people to do the development of the remaining land. If you've been astute enough to negotiate a 250year lease on that land you can offer a long lease to whoever is going to develop that land. With a train link about to be built I would suggest that is an easy sell and way of getting a quick return on your initial investment.
I love the way ex board members word is all of a sudden gospel to you.
And finally. For someone who is apparently doing million dollar deals on a daily basis on the phone I would have expected you to realise that if you don't ask you don't get.
Last edited: