I really Believe that owning the stadium and this 365 Revenue is a smokescreen. From Memory ACL delivered £2 to £3m in profit before the rent strike, so SISU expected to distress ACL by withholding £1.2m. Lets assume that it could be run better with new owners and recurring revenues could be £10m with additional development etc... So more money in borrowed against the long lease.
Lets compare that with the £62m that Cardiff took from the Premier league for TV appearances, TV rights and finishing last!
http://www.sportingintelligence.com...-premier-league-prize-cash-in-2013-14-140501/
Even if we went back to the £1.2m rent that would represent less than 2% of the TV income alone. Given that we may also average 25K support in the Premier league with an average ticket price of say £30. That would represent an additional revenue stream of £14.25m over 19 home games.
So for finishing last we would have basic recurring revenue of £75M. which would put the rent at apron 1.6% of basic Revenue. (excluding any sponsorship deals or cup matches).
So even if the stadium generated say £8m recurring profit this is is surely a cherry on top not a cornerstone of the grand plan.
SISU wanted a single payoff by accumulating the RICOH + football club and then moving on.
The intrinsic value of CCFC is that it has a ticket to enter this competition . With appropriate management , controlled costs than surely this end game would represent a fantastic income stream that would allow something substantial to be built.