Fisher on CWR (9 Viewers)

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Tudgay was a complete panic buy, when we had no strikers....lots of fans thought he would score loads, but this is a player who admitted he almost retired at the end of last season because he had lost the appetite for football?

We have no spine to this team. You sum up my thoughts on Reda, lots of effort but lacking quality and very erratic and at times rash.

But in fairness the whole organisation has no spine.


I was one who thought Tudgay would score but as he can't move I guess he won't score many. Reda reminds me of Mo and The Edge a fans favourite but I can't see why.
 

skybluesam66

Well-Known Member
and ryton may be like a snooker pitch but the ricoh was like a mud bath, and that is before they start playing rugby there
 

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
Yes Lorna Bailey was good and her patter was too, very difficult for Fisher to fall out with in fact I bet should he be interviewed again on cwr he will make sure it isn't Ms. Bailey. What we need now and soon is LB to interview c.e.o. Mr.Waggott, I think she is covering the Shane O'Connor breakfast show for 2 weeks. I don't think she will be taken in by his nice Geordie drones like others, such as Eakin, O'Connor, Foster and Linnell are.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Yes Lorna Bailey was good and her patter was too, very difficult for Fisher to fall out with in fact I bet should he be interviewed again on cwr he will make sure it isn't Ms. Bailey. What we need now and soon is LB to interview c.e.o. Mr.Waggott, I think she is covering the Shane O'Connor breakfast show for 2 weeks. I don't think she will be taken in by his nice Geordie drones like others, such as Eakin, O'Connor, Foster and Linnell are.

Like a politician lots of words but little action from Waggott I despise him and Fisher two cheeks from the same arse!
 

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
Like a politician lots of words but little action from Waggott I despise him and Fisher two cheeks from the same arse!
I have been on an anti Waggott crusade on here for months even been asked if he is banging my missus which upsets the man in my life greatly by the way. As you say other cheek of the same backside, fucked up Charlton Athletic and is openly fucking up our Sky Blues, yet seems to get a lot of support and sympathy on here from the site leader down
 
Last edited:

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
and ryton may be like a snooker pitch but the ricoh was like a mud bath, and that is before they start playing rugby there

it will no doubt take a battering and not be great later in the season. But it is the same for both teams.

however yesterday it wasn't that bad and one of the teams was able to play a decent level of committed and skillfull football ............. sadly it wasn't us
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
it will no doubt take a battering and not be great later in the season. But it is the same for both teams.

however yesterday it wasn't that bad and one of the teams was able to play a decent level of committed and skillfull football ............. sadly it wasn't us

We will just have to change the way we play and move the ball forward more quickly not long ball just more quickly.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Maybe they want him to fail. Hasn't got a choice with a 4 year contract.

I wouldn't mind but if he has lost the dressing room and one of the worst ever defeats in our history then time to go else what's the point. It can't turn while the players don't believe in him.

1. j. Clarke has been rumored to tell SP to stick it.

2. Many red cards and penalties already this season.

4. Just has the worst result of our history or top 3.

5. All these rumors about JOB yesterday.

6. Form all season has been crap even 8 games unbeaten it was mostly draws.

7. The style of football is wank. But better since 4-4-2 but majority has been awful.

My point is all these things considered does he have a chance to succeed?

Oh no. Jordan Clarke has spoken out.
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
Yet Liberty Stadium at Swansea City where the Ospreys Rugby Club share looked like a billiard table on TV yesterday

Its part synthetic to keep it in decent condition apparently. This was planned when they knew Ospreys were goign to play there.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
we are apparently financially stable and TF &co have sorted out the finances to a point that we are cash flow positive

- what does cash flow positive actually mean when TF spouts it? this week, this month this year? what about the future?
- at the moment the club cash flow has benefitted from the Wilson & Christie sales and a windfall from Jutekevicz. There has also been the up front payments on the season tickets. So cash flow has been front loaded hasn't it? what happens say by March if things on the pitch do not improve?
- haven't we budgeted for something like 11k attendances? and therefore locked in to a cost structure that reflects that?
- there are significant payments yet to be included. The interest on the ARVO and SBS&L loans approx. £900k due in December I believe. But according to the 2013 SBS&L accounts a loan of £2.808m falls due for repayment December 2014 too. Yes the loan can be converted to shares but would ARVO do that in the best interests of its investors or would they prefer repayment or penalty levels of interest on default? They could call the money in and force administration but I do not think they will take that action at this time.
- repayment to ARVO means less in the pot to spend on players or players wages come January.

I hear what TF says then look at the above and then think financially stable cash flow positive ....... are we really??? :thinking about:
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
we are apparently financially stable and TF &co have sorted out the finances to a point that we are cash flow positive

- what does cash flow positive actually mean when TF spouts it? this week, this month this year? what about the future?
- at the moment the club cash flow has benefitted from the Wilson & Christie sales and a windfall from Jutekevicz. There has also been the up front payments on the season tickets. So cash flow has been front loaded hasn't it? what happens say by March if things on the pitch do not improve?
- haven't we budgeted for something like 11k attendances? and therefore locked in to a cost structure that reflects that?
- there are significant payments yet to be included. The interest on the ARVO and SBS&L loans approx. £900k due in December I believe. But according to the 2013 SBS&L accounts a loan of £2.808m falls due for repayment December 2014 too. Yes the loan can be converted to shares but would ARVO do that in the best interests of its investors or would they prefer repayment or penalty levels of interest on default? They could call the money in and force administration but I do not think they will take that action at this time.
- repayment to ARVO means less in the pot to spend on players or players wages come January.

I hear what TF says then look at the above and then think financially stable cash flow positive ....... are we really??? :thinking about:

I guess buying half of ACL is not really on the cards then eh??
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
I'm astonised that Fisher has formed sentences without mentioning the words 'We are building a new stadium.'

If you play the interview backwards, he says it, along with a story about his 666 tattoo, how the only reason he is still employed is because of the incriminating photos he has of Joy, and why he is such a cluster f*ck of a buisnessman. He also gives tips on how to be a complete helmet, something he is greatly skilled at.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
I wonder if he'd still be spouting this bollocks if he hadn't naively given him a 4 year Contract for achieving absolutely fuck all. This is the same man who backed Thorn, allowed him to bring in ten players and then sacked him after 3 straight draws; two of which were against league favourites Sheffield United and Yeovil who would go on to win promotion. He is clueless about both business and football and I can honestly say I do not despise anyone as much as i do Fisher. He should have lost his job long before Pressley's came under scrutiny. Disgusting excuse of a human being.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
I think the reason
LB is such a direct interviewer Is Bbecause she Is a fan unlike most of the others and most likely watched that Shiite yesterday
I've no doubt she possibly shares the same disdain for the owners and others responsible for the destruction of our club
We sti'll havent reached the Nadir they are taking us to
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
Was he suggesting Sisu were banking on an FA Cup fixture against a top 8 Premier League club every season?

If you had listened to the interview he explicitly stated they don't budget for this, he was asked how much it had cost the club and he said the last two years the FA Cup has brought in over a million pounds.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
If you had listened to the interview he explicitly stated they don't budget for this, he was asked how much it had cost the club and he said the last two years the FA Cup has brought in over a million pounds.


In some ways I don't really care that they will not get a windfall as it was never going to be converted into spending on the playing side so bad luck Sisu/Arvo etc.
 

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
we are apparently financially stable and TF &co have sorted out the finances to a point that we are cash flow positive

- what does cash flow positive actually mean when TF spouts it? this week, this month this year? what about the future?
- at the moment the club cash flow has benefitted from the Wilson & Christie sales and a windfall from Jutekevicz. There has also been the up front payments on the season tickets. So cash flow has been front loaded hasn't it? what happens say by March if things on the pitch do not improve?
- haven't we budgeted for something like 11k attendances? and therefore locked in to a cost structure that reflects that?
- there are significant payments yet to be included. The interest on the ARVO and SBS&L loans approx. £900k due in December I believe. But according to the 2013 SBS&L accounts a loan of £2.808m falls due for repayment December 2014 too. Yes the loan can be converted to shares but would ARVO do that in the best interests of its investors or would they prefer repayment or penalty levels of interest on default? They could call the money in and force administration but I do not think they will take that action at this time.
- repayment to ARVO means less in the pot to spend on players or players wages come January.

I hear what TF says then look at the above and then think financially stable cash flow positive ....... are we really??? :thinking about:

It is simply because of the smoke and mirrors and tiered layers of finance surrounding the club that I will never feel comfortable or optimistic about our future. I can get over appalling performances on the pitch and poor tactics etc but I don't trust these sharks one bit and think that even when we do unearth a gem of a player or get a lucrative cup game then this lot will merely cash in at every opportunity. SISU OUT !
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
"Yesterday was not about investment on or off the pitch, it was about 11 players failing to want to win the game.

"We were beaten by semi-professionals and that is why we are angry. A footballer is paid to do a job and yesterday they failed to do that."

Exactly how I feel to be honest..




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
we are apparently financially stable and TF &co have sorted out the finances to a point that we are cash flow positive

- what does cash flow positive actually mean when TF spouts it? this week, this month this year? what about the future?
- at the moment the club cash flow has benefitted from the Wilson & Christie sales and a windfall from Jutekevicz. There has also been the up front payments on the season tickets. So cash flow has been front loaded hasn't it? what happens say by March if things on the pitch do not improve?
- haven't we budgeted for something like 11k attendances? and therefore locked in to a cost structure that reflects that?
- there are significant payments yet to be included. The interest on the ARVO and SBS&L loans approx. £900k due in December I believe. But according to the 2013 SBS&L accounts a loan of £2.808m falls due for repayment December 2014 too. Yes the loan can be converted to shares but would ARVO do that in the best interests of its investors or would they prefer repayment or penalty levels of interest on default? They could call the money in and force administration but I do not think they will take that action at this time.
- repayment to ARVO means less in the pot to spend on players or players wages come January.

I hear what TF says then look at the above and then think financially stable cash flow positive ....... are we really??? :thinking about:

The club budgeted for 11k attendances because "the fans" made such a fuss of how loyal they would be back at the Ricoh.
Would you have forecast 7k ? Don't think anyone would.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
The club budgeted for 11k attendances because "the fans" made such a fuss of how loyal they would be back at the Ricoh.
Would you have forecast 7k ? Don't think anyone would.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No I wouldn't have budgeted any different to be honest. However having set up the deal based on breakeven 11k attendances that sets the cost base and if they are not hitting that figure they are now losing money and cash flow on the deal.
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
The club budgeted for 11k attendances because "the fans" made such a fuss of how loyal they would be back at the Ricoh.
Would you have forecast 7k ? Don't think anyone would.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fisher was told to my knowledge at least three times that if they moved back to the Ricoh that the crowds would be at least a couple of thousand less than when we left. But then again the brilliant mastermind didn't listen when we laughed at his estimation of the numbers that would go to Sixfields.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

M&B Stand

Well-Known Member
Astonished at the way pressley gets away with all of this by the way , only manager at any club in history that i know of that literally is getting a pass to fail

Roy Hodgson is getting similar unjustified backing, he's had 2 free tournaments, France 2016 will be another. You can imagine next week Vs Scotland, Strachan will have his players bouncing off the changing room walls, roy will be stood there like Mr Burns.
 

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
The club budgeted for 11k attendances because "the fans" made such a fuss of how loyal they would be back at the Ricoh.
Would you have forecast 7k ? Don't think anyone would.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

When we returned to the Ricoh, many fans hailed it as a new beginning but rather than embrace that your beloved half witted associates at SISU stepped up their campaign of litigation and fairy stories of a new stadium. They so pissed off their landlords once again that they sold half the stadium management company to a franchise rugby club. Now I'm not naïve enough to think that happened overnight but the bare truth is they burnt their bridges with the authorities that run our City when they started threatening personal legal action against individuals and refusing to pay rent to distress ACL. The club is doomed with these fraudulent clowns in charge and almost everyone can see it. I commend you and others for your undying support but you cannot criticise anyone really from distrusting these incompetents and doing other things with their lives. Personally I'm thankful if for nothing else that we are back in Coventry, it gives me the choice again of whether to attend or not.
 

Chipfat

Well-Known Member
The fans are drifting away and the more TF keeps up this bollocks the more will decide until sisu are gone the hours and money spent on the club is better placed somewhere else.. Sisu have took this club and carry on taking it to places most of us could never dream would happen.. Even blaming the result solely on players for yesterday's is incorrect this is collective problem that SISU, SP and the players are responsible for.

Sisu have never stated they are the problem or a part of the problem, they push all on to everyone else and have done from day 1, it's about time they worked out they are a common denominator running through this.. SP is on very safe ground i posted at half time yesterday, he knows it, he signed a 4 year deal with is staff,, he will not walk, he will not get pushed he will carry on picking up his money, like the players that don't care.. Sisu made the 4 year deal available and now are going to suffer for this decision yet another complete fuck up that the fans are paying for.. This is a nightmare that is not going away everyday brings more bollocks, spin, lies and complete blindness on how to run a football club and only god knows where it will end..
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
To be honest , i doubt that many clubs with the past 12-15 years as coventry would be riding high with attendances .
you could argue pompey but i think our situation has been a bit more dire in all fairness and they have the added incentive now as they are fan owned .
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
TF was suppose to come on the show the other day to discuss the bid. However he had to cancel.
Did he discuss the bid or was it all about the defeat.
 

SkyBlueCharlie

Well-Known Member
No I wouldn't have budgeted any different to be honest. However having set up the deal based on breakeven 11k attendances that sets the cost base and if they are not hitting that figure they are now losing money and cash flow on the deal.

That cannot be the case though can OSB, remember we are cash flow positive!
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
The way his voice breaks near the end where he says Pressley Is here long term Is a giveaway ,just like when you get caught playing away by the wife ,Deny Deny Deny .
 

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
Interesting that it was the chairman, new chairman at that who did the interview. When appointed to that role we were told he was responsible for the proposed new stadium and everything else was down to the new c.e.o. Steve Waggott. During the interview TF mentioned Waggott as just that Waggott, not Steve or even Steve Waggott ! do I detect a split in the camp ? I would have thought the c.e.o. whould have been up for interview as he is more hands on with the squad, manager and state of the team.

Regularly calls him Waggott or Waggy - could be worse !!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top