BBC Midlands Today report on SISU coming up.... (3 Viewers)

Forums New posts
H

howzer

Banned
its been made clear they dont want to sell the stadium share to sisu. the council and the higgs should also be targeted by protesters but mostly the council. the council has a duty to the city, it should in my opinion hand the share to the club and allow payments to be made over time. i think the whole lot of them are making arses out of us, the club, the owners, the council ... hoffman, etc etc.. believe me if a multi billionaire turned up wanting to buy the club in the morning the club would be sold by dinner time.

im not justifying the actions of sisu, but i think we maybe jumping the gun, we all expected a firesale.. myself included. we got in a good prospect, the kind a lot of us would have been happy with even with out all the current historyonics. got rid of a crock who hasnt played for a year for a good amount, he may have peaked and he certainly wasnt a scott dann level player. got a decent keeper in Murphy ans wether we believe them or not they have released a statement that at least aknowledges they have made mistakes, would do things differently if they could go back, but most importantly for me was the admission that they had adapted a hands off approach, and they now realise they must be more involved directly with the team and the fans. I think they have decided to give it a proper go i really do, they could simply have sold up to Hoffman ... if they have losses of 30 million ... they need to make it back so lets not knock them for recouping theyre losses from sales of players. Every club does it ..it isnt just us lads.

if they turn out to be full of it again i will personally start a brian haw type protest up at the door of Ken Dulux, but i have a strong feeling our season is about to take a turn for the better.
 
Disorganised1

Disorganised1

New Member
The council has a duty to council tax payers - they cannot sell their share for less than market value - they also have a duty to the City, and should choose carefully who they sell to, or decide if theywill get a better return from holding onto that share.
 
Sub

Sub

Well-Known Member
well atleast you know who told the goon squad to take the banners down at the last game :jerkit::jerkit:
 
Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
howzer said:
its been made clear they dont want to sell the stadium share to sisu. the council and the higgs should also be targeted by protesters but mostly the council. the council has a duty to the city, it should in my opinion hand the share to the club and allow payments to be made over time. i think the whole lot of them are making arses out of us, the club, the owners, the council ... hoffman, etc etc.. believe me if a multi billionaire turned up wanting to buy the club in the morning the club would be sold by dinner time.

im not justifying the actions of sisu, but i think we maybe jumping the gun, we all expected a firesale.. myself included. we got in a good prospect, the kind a lot of us would have been happy with even with out all the current historyonics. got rid of a crock who hasnt played for a year for a good amount, he may have peaked and he certainly wasnt a scott dann level player. got a decent keeper in Murphy ans wether we believe them or not they have released a statement that at least aknowledges they have made mistakes, would do things differently if they could go back, but most importantly for me was the admission that they had adapted a hands off approach, and they now realise they must be more involved directly with the team and the fans. I think they have decided to give it a proper go i really do, they could simply have sold up to Hoffman ... if they have losses of 30 million ... they need to make it back so lets not knock them for recouping theyre losses from sales of players. Every club does it ..it isnt just us lads.

if they turn out to be full of it again i will personally start a brian haw type protest up at the door of Ken Dulux, but i have a strong feeling our season is about to take a turn for the better.
Click to expand...


Well, if true, and i say "if," the word out there apparently seems to be that the council and Higgs will not sell to Sisu but will to Hoffman. So why is that you have to ask? Has to be down simply to the fact that they do not want to deal with Sisu.

If this is true that the council and Higgs won't consider Sisu but would other owners why would anyone consider protesting against the council? My initial thought and that of sane majority would obviously to be to ask why they won't sell to Sisu and why they don't trust them. Would also have me very much more doubting Sisu too.
 
Sub

Sub

Well-Known Member
i don't think they should sell the ground to SISU because i think that is all they are after anyway:thinking about::thinking about::thinking about:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)
Top