S P s four year contract (1 Viewer)

wince

Well-Known Member
A lot of people have questioned the wisdom of S P s four year contract ,but now he can not walk , and loose 3 years pay , so even if he wanted to walk he couldn't ,as bad as he is ,and in 6 months time, his reputation will be rock bottom he will still have a job, very cleaver from sisu really
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
A lot of people have questioned the
wisdom of S P s four year contract ,but now he can not walk , and loose 3 years pay , so even if he wanted to walk he couldn't ,as bad as he is ,and in 6 months time, his reputation will be rock bottom he will still have a job, very cleaver from sisu really

There is probably a clause in the contract so SISU can get rid but even if not I understand that these contracts are very rarely paid in full, rather a settlement is reached.
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
Even sisu cannot be that stupid to not have a get out clause

Ahh I think I have stumbled on something, just going on past history

They will go on a pay strike until he leaves
 

The Lurker

Well-Known Member
Don't get me wrong, life under Pressley at the minute is shocking however only 4 months ago when he signed the contract everyone on here were praising the decision
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Can guarantee CCFC would get it the wrong way round. If we'd not given him along contract no doubt he'd be tearing up the division above, leading some team to a glorious promotion into the top flight.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
A lot of people have questioned the wisdom of S P s four year contract ,but now he can not walk , and loose 3 years pay , so even if he wanted to walk he couldn't ,as bad as he is ,and in 6 months time, his reputation will be rock bottom he will still have a job, very cleaver from sisu really

Failing managers never walk.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
I seem to recall SP saying : in a few months time you could be calling for my head.

Or something to that effect....
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
There is probably a clause in the contract so SISU can get rid but even if not I understand that these contracts are very rarely paid in full, rather a settlement is reached.

Normally you would have targets to meet that you agree on.
I would have thought that Sisu could get rid of him cheaply if he does not meet them.
But then it's Sisu.
 

wince

Well-Known Member
Normally you would have targets to meet that you agree on.
I would have thought that Sisu could get rid of him cheaply if he does not meet them.
But then it's Sisu.
The point sisu don't want to get rid of him because no one else would stick around for long if they got the job , once all the promises had been broken , (mark robins the casing point
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
Don't get me wrong, life under Pressley at the minute is shocking however only 4 months ago when he signed the contract everyone on here were praising the decision

I'm going to need spreadsheets and graphs proving that please. Nice one.
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
I think this is a point, the fans did want SP to stay for a long time and he had a lot of praise when the team were playing great football last year. They signed him up and now he is the devil...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top