Les Reid prefers GMK (18 Viewers)

[torchomatic]

Like when Stuart Linnell did. It just ends up with abuse.

I'm pretty much sure he came on here. Didn't fare very well, I recall...

 

---

[skybluebeduff]

Like when Stuart Linnell did. It just ends up with abuse.

Surely a moderator can actually moderate it though?, what else are they here for apart from the obvious?

 

[skybluedan]

Who the fuck is he? Can someone tell me please

 

[Ashdown]

How incredibly unprofessional for a journalist to even infer such ridiculous rubbish about the different sites. Does the prat not think that the same posters just have different names for different sites. Some us of course have always only ever had one username to hide behind and haven't been interested in anything but genuine discussion although I did have to make myself a Lord once on GMK as the site wouldn't accept the plain 'Ashdown' having crashed for the umpteenth time.

 

[lordsummerisle]

How incredibly unprofessional for a journalist to even infer such ridiculous rubbish about the different sites. Does the prat not think that the same posters just have different names for different sites. Some us of course have always only ever had one username to hide behind and haven't been interested in anything but genuine discussion although I did have to make myself a Lord once on GMK as the site wouldn't accept the plain 'Ashdown' having crashed for the umpteenth time.

Only room for one Lord on these sites Ash!

 

[Noggin]

Good to see SBT demonstrating Les' point. Good work.

I don't think anyone has even come close to proving his point.

 

[Ashdown]

Sorry Sir, I accept that of course, that's why I stripped myself of the peerage as soon as I could { doffs cap }

 

[skybluetony176]

I don't think anyone has even come close to proving his point.

Certainly not SISU's legal team anyway

 

[Noggin]

Spot on. Gmk has 7 comments a thread. Les Reid has shown blocks anyone who disagrees with him.

I don't like Nicks views or how he puts them across but he is 10 times the man Les Reid is when it comes to allowing reasonable debate. You can be very scathing of Nick right to his face and he will allow it, look at Les Reid wrong and his toys go everywhere.

 

[Mary_Mungo_Midge]

Like when Stuart Linnell did. It just ends up with abuse.

I disagree. I thought Linnell argued his point - although not one that I agreed with - very well, and if anything was afforded too much deference

 

[Noggin]

Certainly not SISU's legal team anyway

you're quick witted today, nice job.

 

[fernandopartridge]

5 pages on it now.

 

[skybluetony176]

5 pages on it now.

His ego must be sky high. Well higher anyway.

 

[fernandopartridge]

His ego must be sky high. Well higher anyway.

Journalist of the year and now battling for the crown of 'most SBT vitriol 2015' with Pressley

 

[Nick]

I don't like Nicks views or how he puts them across but he is 10 times the man Les Reid is when it comes to allowing reasonable debate. You can be very scathing of Nick right to his face and he will allow it, look at Les Reid wrong and his toys go everywhere.

Awwww (insert heart smiley)

Can I have that framed for next time somebody accuses me of censorship on here?

 

[Noggin]

Awwww (insert heart smiley)

Can I have that framed for next time somebody accuses me of censorship on here?

I've never thought you were guilty of censorship, I've always felt it was a completely unfair comment towards you, If anything I think the moderation should be stricter. I don't think I've ever had a post deleted that wasn't part of some big cleanup (that I know about anyway, I've certainly not been told off) and I'm positive I've deserved it on numerous occasions when tempers have run high.

 

[Noggin]

Journalist of the year and now battling for the crown of 'most SBT vitriol 2015' with Pressley

Fisher surely has that sewn up. There is hardly any vitriol on this thread at all though, 1 person called him an arse. There is a lack of respect for him certainly but he's earned that.

 

[Nick]

I've never thought you were guilty of censorship, I've always felt it was a completely unfair comment towards you, If anything I think the moderation should be stricter. I don't think I've ever had a post deleted that wasn't part of some big cleanup and I'm positive I've deserved it on numerous occasions when tempers have run high.

No I wasn't saying it was you, but there are quite a few who like to throw that line about

 

[Noggin]

No I wasn't saying it was you, but there are quite a few who like to throw that line about

sorry I didn't mean you to think that I thought you were accusing me of that (well that was convoluted) I was just stating my position clearly, I know you've been accused of censorship and I think those comments are baseless and unfair.

 

[Mary_Mungo_Midge]

No I wasn't saying it was you, but there are quite a few who like to throw that line about

Not I either. It's no secret that I fervently disagree with much of what you say - and you I in return, I'm sure - but I have to say, you allow a debate to rage; even if it's critical of your stance. Or you. Or your hair....

 

[tisza]

No I wasn't saying it was you, but there are quite a few who like to throw that line about

alright Les don't be so sensitive

 

[Ashdown]

True, he doesn't resort to the 'Thick pig' retorts if challenged !

 

[torchomatic]

Didn't Nick say recently that Shmmeee had more than one account? Maybe he'll tell us what it was?

Thats you and Grendel doing it, at least you aren't wrongly accusing people directly in threads, 3 times he's accused me of being someone else. Honestly I feel I waste far to much of my life posting here with one account, I can't for the life of me think it would be a good idea to run another one.

 

[Nick]

I wouldn't ever divulge, for info it isn't an on going thing either. Was just an example when people question the rules yet have broken most of them themselves.

 

[covmark]

Not I either. It's no secret that I fervently disagree with much of what you say - and you I in return, I'm sure - but I have to say, you allow a debate to rage; even if it's critical of your stance. Or you. Or your hair....

Oi, there's nothing wrong with Nicks hair

 

[torchomatic]

http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/37149-CCFC-Chat/page3?highlight=stuart+linnell

I disagree. I thought Linnell argued his point - although not one that I agreed with - very well, and if anything was afforded too much deference

 

[torchomatic]

Sorry, I meant I wonder if Shmmeee would tell us.

I wouldn't ever divulge, for info it isn't an on going thing either. Was just an example when people question the rules yet have broken most of them themselves.

 

[Moff]

For Les Reid, the Award Winning Journalist, to accuse other folk of having a prejudicial view is red-hot favourite for winning the Pot Calling The Kettle Black Awards of 2015; and January is barely through...

Will it hurt you to hand the PCTKB award on to its next recipient?

 

[Astute]

Journalist of the year and now battling for the crown of 'most SBT vitriol 2015' with Pressley

Last seen looking for a smoking gun......

 

[covcity4life]

I wouldn't ever divulge, for info it isn't an on going thing either. Was just an example when people question the rules yet have broken most of them themselves.

ahah shmee

btw i have a second account but it was only set up when this was broken, havnt used since!

 

[mrtrench]

I think that Les is very egotistical - I was also blocked by him on Twitter for disagreeing with him. He must have a very fragile ego.

 

[lordsummerisle]

I think that Les is very egotistical - I was also blocked by him on Twitter for disagreeing with him. He must have a very fragile ego.

Well Twitter is for egotists and professional "outrage"er's.

 

[bigfatronssba]

It does seem as though Les Reid has an issue with those who have a different opinion to himself.

Not a good trait for a journo.

 

[Terry Gibson's perm]

Could not care less about what Les Reid has to say so I hope he stays on GMK.

 

[Grendel]

Reid is correct.

Football fans are supposed to put their club first above all else. This site is unique in that it has council sycophants and many who do not seem to have any interest at all in the future of the club but just want more and more manure dumped on it so they can stick two fingers up at the owners.

You wouldn't get idiots bragging about wasps on normal forums.

If other club supporters visited this site and saw some of the pro council tripe we really would be the ultimate laughing stock.

At least gmk have real supporters - interested in the club and only the club.