lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
No to be fair, that is his dads, used to post quite a lot on GMK back in the day.
'Anti-SISU brigade' (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter SydneySkyBlue
- Start date
No to be fair, that is his dads, used to post quite a lot on GMK back in the day.
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
Never a good quality to be so certain that you're right that anybody who disagrees is an idiot though.
Especially when you're wrong.
Nick
Administrator
Yep I know, but it was him logging in and using it a few times. Which was my point when he went on about being strict with the rules etc so I said that is against the rules. I did say then it isn't an "ongoing" thing where somebody is living a double life etc.
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
Nick
Administrator
No, I didn't get any legal letters or anything but there was talk of it so more a threat. I just took it as something said when somebody was angry to be fair.
Ironically not the only thing like that I have had off members when people disagree with them. Usually the ones who love to go on about SISU taking legal action against fans.
fellatio_Martinez
Well-Known Member
SISU are to football what Jimmy Saville was to hospitals.
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
Loved by everybody then hated?
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
As I said, he does like a strop if he's had a bit too much Sunny D!
fellatio_Martinez
Well-Known Member
Yeah and they both fucked something that was long dead.
Nick
Administrator
DazzleTommyDazzle
Well-Known Member
lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
Doesn't that describe most of us on here though?
Quite possibly!
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I bet SISU told you to say that.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
The man that made no mistakes made nothing. It's impossible to be right about everything in the first place and to assume that someone/anyone ever could is plain and simple stupid. Probably more stupid than not being big enough to admit you're wrong and change your mind when it becomes obvious that you should.
Nick
Administrator
I'd much prefer to listen to somebody who is right most of the time than somebody who is wrong a lot and keeps changing their mind. Wouldn't you
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
SydneySkyBlue
Member
Intentionally splitting the fan base as a strategy is a new one. I've updated my list. While it doesn't surprise me (nothing has for a long time now) what was the plan? Was this when they were trying to create a loyal following in Northampton?
I've just remembered the time they were caught selling training shirts featuring the faint branding of Leicester City's crest! How very apt.
I've just remembered the time they were caught selling training shirts featuring the faint branding of Leicester City's crest! How very apt.
Last edited:
Astute
Well-Known Member
Does this mean that you are going to ignore Les Reid from now?
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
Shirley..sorry...Surely Sepalla, Fisher, and Waggott must be included too
SydneySkyBlue
Member
A new day, a new reason added.
hill83
Well-Known Member
Upside down in a spider infested hell hole is not a reason.
SydneySkyBlue
Member
Some of us take boycotting seriously.
letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
In another thread you asked for a link to a post by anyone other than RFC defending SISU. Well here you are.
If this had been posted on any other thread I'd have argued that it was defending by stealth (i.e. the quick,let's change the subject quick method that you and some others do on a regular basis when people start pointing the finger at SISU) but given the topic of this thread I'm going to promote your post to out and out defending.
Nick
Administrator
No, that is saying something about the council and telegraph. This defending by stealth stuff is bollocks. Find something actually defending them, rather than somebody saying they like blue which is taken as they hate green.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Denial isn't a river in Africa.
Nick
Administrator
Post a link to somebody actually defending them. Ie saying they have done nothing wrong, saying they are proud of them etc. Not somebody saying the council are bad.
Apparently it happens all the time so won't be too hard. Obviously bar rfc.
rupert_bear
Well-Known Member
I don't "hate" sisu, admittedly I would rather they sold up and moved on and I'd take a chance on someone else. It's those running our football team on SISU's behalf I hate, yes Waggott and Fisher. It is these two who have dictated the policies and the path they seem fit to obtain those policies. It was 100% Fisher's idea to move to Sixfields and the recruitment policy is 100% Waggotts, the appointment and lengthy contract of Pressley was Waggotts, the retention of the hapless Andy Thorn was Waggotts too the cheapest option at the time, the loss of Mark Robins, down to Waggott renageing on promises, forget the official reasons given. Remember in interview Joy Seppalla admitted not even knowing CCFC were part of her organisation, that interview was after the Northampton move. I would love to know the deals both Waggott and Fisher have with sisu for their employment with them, they won't be employees but contracted in to do a job, how are they paid and what does payment depend on.
Astute
Well-Known Member
So does this mean that BS comments about defending CCC cease for the same reason or does it come under a different category so has different rules?
Nick
Administrator
Somebody attacking SISU isn't defending CCC. Somebody saying "Tim Fisher is a wanker" isn't defending CCC.
Somebody defending CCC is saying how proud they are of them, how they have done nothing wrong etc etc.
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
If it wasn't for dickheads like you who welcomed them with open arms and dismissing others asking questions we would probably be in a better position.
The judges at the JR and Higgs case said that the council have done nothing wrong ( in respect of those cases ). Does that make them members of the "anti SISU Brigade"?