TM, SISU & next season (3 Viewers)

[shmmeee]

Or maybe that means from the 5.6 million, 4.6 million is staff costs?

But those two figures, minus the profit equals out loss, so they must be seperate.

 

---

[shmmeee]

it's not the way it reads from the telegraph article but of course that isn't a good way to evaluate the accounts, do we have a free link to look at them?

Otium: http://www.ccfc.co.uk/documents/otium-signed-accounts144-2316099.pdf

SBS&L: http://www.ccfc.co.uk/documents/sbsl-signed-accounts144-2316100.pdf

 

[torchomatic]

So is Simon's article, true, false or somewhere in-between?

it's not the way it reads from the telegraph article but of course that isn't a good way to evaluate the accounts, do we have a free link to look at them?

 

[Noggin]

Otium: http://www.ccfc.co.uk/documents/otium-signed-accounts144-2316099.pdf

SBS&L: http://www.ccfc.co.uk/documents/sbsl-signed-accounts144-2316100.pdf

Thanks, so either the club is going to build a new stadium or Fisher is lying on the accounts, which I'm sure he wouldn't do.

 

[Noggin]

So is Simon's article, true, false or somewhere in-between?

You are much better served asking OSB than me, but the accounts do show that the 4.6mill is staff costs and the 5.6mill is administration completely separate numbers which is the way the article reads.