JLR purchase (21 Viewers)

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
62 acres of land in Whitley
I presume it wasn't suitable for a football stadium?
 

D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Did Sisu ask then?

If you consider the Stadium Forum Committee to have any relation to the club then... yes.

Cllr Maton stated that every site available in the city was primarily for housing or employment in accordance with the City Development plan for the next 20 years.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
I wonder what the differences there is getting planning permission for that and for a stadium.
I assume it is due to traffic?
 

skyblueinBaku

Well-Known Member
I wonder what the differences there is getting planning permission for that and for a stadium.
I assume it is due to traffic?

I'm sure that jobs had something to do with it.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Maybe. However, I can't see why. Say 3000 cars once every two weeks for a stadium to 3000 cars twice a day every day.

*3000 cars is a made up, pulled-out-of-a-hat figure. Could be more. Could be less.

I wonder what the differences there is getting planning permission for that and for a stadium.
I assume it is due to traffic?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
I wonder what the differences there is getting planning permission for that and for a stadium.
I assume it is due to traffic?

Also the following.

The planning authority makes the decisions based on the appropriateness of the application in relation to the existing Coventry Local Plan Policy and National Policy (the Nation Planning Policy Framework – NPPF)

Given the local plan sees sites identified as for housing or employment, a stadium would fail that appropriateness test.
 

LB87ccfc

Member
Did Sisu ask then?

Never have never will .. boring move on, rather the jobs come to Coventry and help out families, than fisher fantasy aka load of bullshit land, aka never going to happen land, aka if you believe any of this stadium tripe go get help aka need I go on..
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

will am i

Active Member
Never have never will .. boring move on, rather the jobs come to Coventry and help out families, than fisher fantasy aka load of bullshit land, aka never going to happen land, aka if you believe any of this stadium tripe go get help aka need I go on..
I dont believe it either but im open minded enough to listen and change my mind unlike so many on here with an entrenched view which means they are incapable of listening or changing their minds. Ive still no idea if SISU asked or not or it just wasnt worth asking. You know facts rather than opinion.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
Two more factories in the pipeline, be interesting to see where they are. Two less sites for a football ground.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
When I lived in Coventry I use to run around the woods by Jag Whitley and I can tell you now why TF never put an offer in. Badger poo. It's everywhere around that general area.

Being serious though so did pass it last week and did think it would be ideal so to ask why no enquiry (assuming there hasn't been one) is the right question. The other question is with this on the door step why are they apparently courting RBC?.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
When I lived in Coventry I use to run around the woods by Jag Whitley and I can tell you now why TF never put an offer in. Badger poo. It's everywhere around that general area.

Being serious though so did pass it last week and did think it would be ideal so to ask why no enquiry (assuming there hasn't been one) is the right question. The other question is with this on the door step why are they apparently courting RBC?.

In fairness I imagine it is greenbelt land, so it would be a no no for a football stadium anyway imo.
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member

474bc9c2384ff57fa7f6d17e83c38630.jpg
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

It's always been earmarked for commercial or housing as Maton admitted.

I can't see how a stadium would go there even if it wasn't given the traffic infrastructure.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
And "confidentiality agreement"

I can't imagine that's too different for any council given that 2 of the major buzz words in politics are employment and housing.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Good news for Cov this. Only the other day on here I was bemoaning the way JLR neglected its so spiritual home.

I see the council are again seeking credit for what is obviously a JLR strategic commercial decision.
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
Good news for Cov this. Only the other day on here I was bemoaning the way JLR neglected its so spiritual home.

I see the council are again seeking credit for what is obviously a JLR strategic commercial decision.

Love your first comment shame you had to add something negative to it.
 

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
It's factually accurate though.

Unfortunately it is not. Unless you or Fern have been involved in the negotiations.
Who knows what the council did or didn't do to help pave the way.

Why put anything negative about such good news.

Just a shame when the Ricoh becomes the JLR Arena that we are not at the table to enjoy the spoils
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
tbf if JLR moved out of the city completely, the council'd cop the flack, so no reason they can't bask a little.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
Loving Mr Gilbert's 5 point piece on the deal - although I can't confirm that publicly.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top