Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
@ Nick..... As well as calling me a liar, you're calling DazzleTommyDazzle a liar too?
Patented deflection tactics.
Are you serious? Read the thread back. You are wrong, the quote I posted was from the article the thread is about.@ Nick..... As well as calling me a liar, you're calling DazzleTommyDazzle a liar too?
It's the wrong link...@ hill83....... Where have I made a balls up then? I've posted a link to which prove I and DazzleTommyDazzle are not liars.
@ hill83....... Where have I made a balls up then? I've posted a link to which prove I and DazzleTommyDazzle are not liars.
Are you serious? Read the thread back. You are wrong, the quote I posted was from the article the thread is about.
I wonder if different people write the headline/short blurb.
I have a feeling Simon has mentioned in the past that the headlines are nothing to do with him.
No - why do I want to deflect?
Div
1. You failed to acknowledge the part which was missed from dazzletommys copy and paste, which nick pointed out. Tommy even acknowledged it himself.
2. You then linked the entirely wrong article
3. You have simply got to be on a wind up, nobody can be as relentlessly and consistently thick as you and feed themselves.
You are actually starting to piss me off now.
I challenge you to name a poster who believes that. Plenty think that ccc are innocent in all of this though.
What you on about? Have you read the thread?Look Nick and Gren are pissing in the wind as usual lets all move on........
Next...
What are you talking about? I suggest you have a good read before you end up sat with sbk.Yes have you Nick give up you are losing this battle big time.
Even I know when I am beaten.
you are looking a bigger fool then usual.
No - why do I want to deflect?
Yeah Grendel, answer the question that can't be answered. Do us all a favour.
He probably shouldn't have started a second thread on a non-story (Grendulls own words) with a question. It was bound to lead to further questions. The irony being he's done a very good job of keeping this "non-story" going.
I agree with you. I want to see if he'll pull something out of thin air and answer it.
Edit: He makes a valid point about the telegraph but it didn't require a new thread.
He probably shouldn't have started a second thread on a non-story (Grendulls own words) with a question. It was bound to lead to further questions. The irony being he's done a very good job of keeping this "non-story" going.
Edit: He makes a valid point about the telegraph
but it didn't require a new thread.
I agree with you. I want to see if he'll pull something out of thin air and answer it.
Edit: He makes a valid point about the telegraph but it didn't require a new thread.
Get you with your SISU sympathising ways.
Nah, should have been a 'hill is a SISU sympathiser' thread.
Fuck it, this thread is superb, even more mental than usual on here!
I'm just relieved that everyone agreed with me - that the article was a sensationalist non story that was never going to come to anything.
I'm just a bit confused why so few who now say it on here didn't say it then.....
You still haven't said how you know that SP hasn't begun legal proceedings have you?
If he has what do you think might be the first thing that happens?
A bit like you swallowing your fav website's estimated transfer fees, and you posting them on here as a fact?There is no irony - just a general annoyance that people swallow everything the local media chuck at them if they think it's helping to chuck rocks and the owners. Chucking rocks at a iron wall is a bit pointless. They just bounce off.
So your saying the original thread was a non story?
The same as you saying it's fact players haven't signed for us because they think we will go bust?A bit like you swallowing your fav website's estimated transfer fees, and you posting them on here as a fact?