No this isn't a joke (5 Viewers)

Astute

Well-Known Member
Its always great when people use the argument you have no evidence apart from the evidence that I'm going to ignore!

The evidence is the SCG minutes, the clubs response on Twitter and the response to me when I asked the question directly on matchday. So what you're actually saying is that in all those instances the club is outright lying. You say I have no evidence, I see little evidence showing the club to be lying on this matter.

Why is it so hard for you to imagine we've asked for something and Wasps have said no?

So we asked to use a kiosk that sells food to sell club items that are not food which other than being far from ideal might not even be legal so you make out that it is a full refusal. How about finding out what was agreed SISU wanted and agreed on for our return before finding someone guilty as charged. IIRC Fisher said that they didn't want an office or anything, but now right at the end of the season they want a shop. Did they not want anything to sell in a shop as they didn't want one? And after many complaints of not being able to buy anything from our club they are trying to shift the blame as usual? At least as likely as what you are coming out with.
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
So we asked to use a kiosk that sells food to sell club items that are not food which other than being far from ideal might not even be legal so you make out that it is a full refusal. How about finding out what was agreed SISU wanted and agreed on for our return before finding someone guilty as charged. IIRC Fisher said that they didn't want an office or anything, but now right at the end of the season they want a shop. Did they not want anything to sell in a shop as they didn't want one? And after many complaints of not being able to buy anything from our club they are trying to shift the blame as usual? At least as likely as what you are coming out with.

If you are saying that wasps cant be guilty as charged until the full facts are known, then equally perhaps it should not be implied that the club may be shifting blame as usual, if these same full facts are not known.

To be honest we may never know, but I wont lie, I still fucking hate Wasps.

(I also hate SISU before the usuals start moaning)
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
Its always great when people use the argument you have no evidence apart from the evidence that I'm going to ignore!

The evidence is the SCG minutes, the clubs response on Twitter and the response to me when I asked the question directly on matchday. So what you're actually saying is that in all those instances the club is outright lying. You say I have no evidence, I see little evidence showing the club to be lying on this matter.

Why is it so hard for you to imagine we've asked for something and Wasps have said no?

So, just where is this refusal ?

SCG Minutes

• SB asked about the club shop table, which was inadequate. He required if we could not being a mobile unit which could be set up for each match. TS agreed it was inadequate but unfortunately it was impossible to transport one to each game and there was no storage areas in the Ricoh that we could use. • JM asked

Twitter feed

e1a665cf56d20436d0acebe1d0a25964.png
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
So we asked to use a kiosk that sells food to sell club items that are not food which other than being far from ideal might not even be legal so you make out that it is a full refusal. How about finding out what was agreed SISU wanted and agreed on for our return before finding someone guilty as charged. IIRC Fisher said that they didn't want an office or anything, but now right at the end of the season they want a shop. Did they not want anything to sell in a shop as they didn't want one? And after many complaints of not being able to buy anything from our club they are trying to shift the blame as usual? At least as likely as what you are coming out with.


No the kiosk was a solution a fan put forward and the club said its not possible (that may be because the club are well aware it isn't legal/possible so didn't even ask) All we know is that the club asked for a more permanent space
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
So, just where is this refusal ?

You just posted it, "this hasn't been provided to us yet", doesn't sound like Wasps sprang into action to provide a better facility to me but of course everything always has to be totally the fault of SISU.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
You just posted it, "this hasn't been provided to us yet", doesn't sound like Wasps sprang into action to provide a better facility to me but of course everything always has to be totally the fault of SISU.

tbf it doesn't read as a flat out refusal but also doesn't read as though ACL were that keen to help either. I'd imagine they would be happy for us to do it if we paid enough for the storage space inside the Arena or for the right to sell merchandise outside the stadium.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
You just posted it, "this hasn't been provided to us yet", doesn't sound like Wasps sprang into action to provide a better facility to me but of course everything always has to be totally the fault of SISU.

'Hasn't been provided yet' is not a refusal.

'Hope to have a better option for next season' is not the result of a refusal.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
You just posted it, "this hasn't been provided to us yet", doesn't sound like Wasps sprang into action to provide a better facility to me but of course everything always has to be totally the fault of SISU.

Or the fault of Wasps/CCC and SISU not at fault.

So when did SISU ask for, and what did they ask for that Wasps didn't spring into action for?
 

Leamington Pete

Well-Known Member
You just posted it, "this hasn't been provided to us yet", doesn't sound like Wasps sprang into action to provide a better facility to me but of course everything always has to be totally the fault of SISU.

To me it just sounds like we haven't tried very hard. The plainly obvious solution is a trailer like the Peterborough one, towed on site every game. Why the heck can't it be stored at Ryton? Could be used at other events to publicise the club too.
 

skyblueinBaku

Well-Known Member
Apparently, as far as a mobile kiosk is concerned, "it's impossible to transport one to each game". Why can't TF fit a towbar to his Range Rover and tow it? Surely the kiosk is not all that big.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Apparently, as far as a mobile kiosk is concerned, "it's impossible to transport one to each game". Why can't TF fit a towbar to his Range Rover and tow it? Surely the kiosk is not all that big.

When I go to the Ricoh instead of turning right into the Ricoh car park I turn left into the metal fabricators / shot blasters who not only have a massive yard also looking at the thing's dotted around their yard they do storage. Its next-door to the Ricoh any trailer would need towing a matter of yards. They may even have the equipment to tow it across the road for them. They'll never know if they don't ask.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
They have asked the stadium owners?

They've asked them if they can park a mobile shop at the side of the Ricoh on match day's?

They could park it where the interactive fans trailers were parked by the TV company who filmed the Gillingham game. They got permission why wouldn't the club? Offcourse SISU would also have to invest in the said mobile shop and stock to put in it but like others have pointed out its mobile so it could attend all sorts of events around Coventry and the wider Warwickshire area. Get out and promote the club. Lots of fairs, festivals etc. around the region during the summer. Who knows it might even entice a few people to come to games.
 

Nick

Administrator
You mean council jack, again, according to your mate grendull. There's a pattern forming here.
No, it was me asking. I didn't say council Jack, I asked him the question to find out what he meant.

What's the pattern? Apart from you having a thing for another member.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
If this wasn't a rhetorical question then yes the People has the same owners as the CT.

Strange that.

Trinity group - that name rings a bell somewhere.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top