Oh back again?
The 83m was for the build and infrastructure.
The build cost of the arena and infrastructure was 113m. It even included changes made to a train line bridge and decontaminating the land it was built on. The cost of building the arena is said to be 113m. Or are you going to change this?
The only thing you have proved is that when shown to be wrong you twist words and change the subject as much as what you can. And you know that you ruin threads doing so. And you never showed the slightest proof like you said you did. Just a normal day for you. Well done massive paid job Grendel who never even knew anything about what was going on with where you say you work and what your job is.
So what and where are these links galore you say you have given
According to MMM the burden of proof is on the person making the initial statement.
I've;
Provided links to prove the ground cost nothing like you claimed.
Showed evidence from a very respected source that Winkleman was less then reliable when giving accurate information
Quoted from companies house the accounts from the various companies that fall under the collective banner which show when a loan was taken - 5 years after the construction of the ground.
Provided links to totally unrelated projects (a Hilton hotel and a multi plex cinema) that are associated with the construction company
Yet all you do is quote one paragraph from a guardian article that doesn't even claim what you say is true. Oh and that journalist isn't exactly in the same league as the one I quoted anyway - but hey who cares.
No wonder they pissed themselves laughing on GMK when I once quoted you on there.
I still admire your dogged determination to believe everything you say to be fair. It's a great quality really.
