Latest SCG meeting (8 Viewers)

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
The meeting minutes for the Supporters Consultative Group which took place on Wednesday, April 22nd are now available...
Coventry City Football Club
Supporters’ Consultative Group Meeting
Wednesday 22 April 2015, 6.15 p.m.
Alan Berry Building, Coventry University, Coventry

M I N U T E S

Present:

Steve Brown (SBR), Jan Mokrzycki (JM), Chris McGrath (CM), Pat Raybould (PR), Tynan Scope (TS), Ray Stephens (RS), Jonathan Strange, Vice Chairman (JS), Peter Ward, Chairman (PW), Robert Tidmarsh (RT), Kieran Crowley (KC), Pat Abel (PA), Sandra Garlick (SG), Kevin Monks (KM), Darren Davies (DD), Tim Fisher (TF), CJ Joiner (CJ), Mike Garlick (MG), Jim Brown (JB), Ian Davidson (ID), Mark Hornby (MH), Adam Dent (AD), Kev Monks (KM)

Apologies:

Steve Barnett, Dale Hayward, David Busst

Introduction

PW welcomed everyone to the meeting and introduced a new member to the group, CJ Joiner who is part of the younger generation of members. He also welcomed Steve Brookfield, the club's Finance Director. Steve had been invited to talk about the state of the club financially. Tim Fisher and Steve Waggott were also welcomed to the meeting

Minutes of Last meeting

Circulated earlier by email, the meeting accepted as a true and fair record.

Matters Arising:

ID advised that he was missed off the attendees’ mailing list. PW has updated the list and will send to all members to confirm their details are correct.

PW said that he was disappointed by the recent comments publicised about him by the Sky Blue Trust and posted on the SBT website. PW questioned why the SBT felt it necessary to openly criticise the Chairman of the group outside of SCG meetings, and asked what motive the SBT has to undermine the SCG, of which the SBT is part. He asked SBR if he had sanctioned this.

SBR said he does not claim to represent any group of supporters and never has. He represents himself, he will not apologise or withdraw comments.

PW said he is concerned about the actions of some members of the group to mislead supporters. PW asked SBR why, when the SCG had invited the Chairman of the club to give a detailed report of the Club’s accounts at the last meeting, the Trust published their own interpretation with no reference to what Mr Fisher had reported to the SCG.

JS advised that SCG members should not publish assertions about the motives of colleagues who haven't even spoken

Issues Log

ID asked how things were progressing with this as he had put forward a lot of questions to the club on behalf of the London Supporters Group and had no response. PW said it was work in progress and would welcome any help with it. ID offered his help and this was accepted by PW.

Board Meeting

A meeting note had been issued prior to the meeting to summarise the SCG representation at the March Board meeting. PW asked if there were any questions arising.

SBR asked if the 5 point plan had been discussed. JB said yes, in parts during the meeting.

PW advised that a number of references had been made during the Board meeting to Financial Fair Play and the Football League’s Salary Cost Management protocol, and for this reason he has asked Steve Brookfield to attend the SCG meeting to bring this matter more widely to the attention of supporters.

Steve Brookfield

SB gave an overview of the Football League’s Salary Cost Management protocol

• Introduced into all 3 divisions of the Football League in 2012/3, having been trialed in League “ for a few years
• The Salary Cost Management Protocol (SCMP) limits spending on player wages to a proportion of the club’s turnover
• Any breach of the permitted spending threshold results in a transfer embargo
• Turnover is generated by Season Ticket sales, gate receipts, sponsorship and other activities that can be proven to be produced by “football club” activities
• The Football League’s scrutiny is intense, calling for a budget to be agreed pre-season, based on expected turnover, with close and regular monitoring throughout the season
• The threshold is League One is currently running at 60%
• Given CCFC’s current attendance, the player wage budget is circa £2m per annum
• Against the Football League’s benchmarking survey, this is believed to be upper quartile for League One
• There was some discussion and explanation from SB to clarify the misunderstanding about the difference between the salary cap, the P&L and cash flow
• The salary cap can now include "football fortune" where revenue from a cup run or TV and equity from the owner, could now be included. This was not the case at the time of our Arsenal games. There was a long discussion on this and the Callum Wilson transfer was used as an example (without specific amounts). It was made clear that only physical cash received could be included in the salary cap calculation. Any future cash received would be counted at that time. So whilst the P&L and cash flow would show player costs, loan signings and compromise agreements costs and commitments only the amount received in cash in the season could be used for the salary cap calculation
• The salary cap included all player costs, but not those for under 21 players, and it was confirmed that it did not include the manager and his coaching staff
• There was also discussion on various models a club could use, the sustainable model (living within our means) vs the benefactor model. SW mentioned that from the benchmarking study only 8 League One teams had benefited from their benefactor last season
• The Steve Lansdown Bristol City example was used to demonstrate this. The Club confirmed it would follow the sustainable model and therefore the importance of season ticket sales to bring in revenues
• For CCFC to invest in a playing squad to capable of mounting a promotion Challenge, it needs to increase its turnover, ie season ticket sales are key
• TF reminded the group of the need to increase revenue streams to build a sustainable future; this was not possible in the current situation of renting a playing venue for match days only
• SB confirmed that revenues from non-football items like conference centres/hotel could be included but only when there is clear evidence of a link to a football club’s business which is hugely scrutinised
• SW offered to circulate the Hartlepool FC FAQ on the salary cap.

DD asked about the possibility of buying season tickets by direct debit as for some fans this is the only way they can afford to buy a season ticket. Steve Brookfield answered that they were waiting for a response from FCA with an answer.

Steve Waggott said that the club wants to create an atmosphere within the ground and asked for suggestions from the group. After much discussion it was decided to setup a working group for Season Tickets and seat configuration.

This was to be held on Tuesday 28 April and the volunteers were:

RS, PR, DD, ID, KM, RT, CJ, JS, MG, JM

Next Board Meeting

This will take place on 22 June and two representatives of the SCG will be invited to attend.

Any Other Business

DD asked if the club could give fans more warning when away tickets for sale are running out. MH said that the club's social media is regularly updated on the position of ticket sales.

ID asked about the pre-season tour. SW confirmed that the planning of it is moving along and is close to finalising. The fans will be updated and will also have the chance to book hotels for it too. The date it is to be held is the 3rd week of July and will be in Europe

SW advised that there would be no "home" friendlies due to the pitch not being ready

ID asked it to be noted in the minutes of thanks to Tynan Scope for the LSCSC Player of the Season Award

PR reported that the last family zone was a great success and that there was money in the kitty to role forward to next season.

MG said that the beer prices had been raised in the Yorkshire Bank lounge to £4.00.

JB asked if it would be possible to play videos games before kick off to get the crowd going. KC advised this wouldn't be possible as there is a copyright on videos.

JB advised The next golf day is 4 June and will be held at Stoneleigh Deer Park.

JM asked how things were progressing with the Kit. SW replied it will be ready soon. There will be a new manufacturer this year.

Date of next meeting
Wednesday 20 May (provisional)
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Would be a lot better without the personal nonsense at the start. Where was the chair? It's their job to keep things on topic.

So, are we any closer to knowing what additional revenues are worth exploring? Brookfields answer seems to suggest it's got to have a provable link to football business.

A few decent nuggets in there. It's a shame there doesn't seem to be anyone knowledgeable enough to question things like the DD requirement. I'm sure we saw something posted on here saying there were ways around that.

Is it normal to be two meetings behind in the minutes? Or will we get the May report quicker?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Would be a lot better without the personal nonsense at the start. Where was the chair? It's their job to keep things on topic.

As far as I can see, the chair was responsible for the personal nonsense at the start...

But yes, I'd forgotten that little storm last time until it was brought up again here:facepalm:

Not entirely convinced the publishing of the minutes is achieving what's hoped. Sure, it's transparent, but some things should maybe stay behind closed doors if it's just mud slinging. It kind of detracts from the rest too.
 

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
It just seems to hammer out SISU's stance that they will not invest a penny more now. The club will run itself from within it's means. It's hard to fault them completely for that as they have lost enough money believing previous managers and giving them £ millions to spend on dross !
Sadly TM will be hamstrung financially by the failures of all his predecessors, if he really does pull this off on a shoestring it will one of his finest moments in management.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
Wouldn't be SCG minutes if it didn't include certain characters criticising the Trust....... It would seem ok for some to go public with assertions but not others...... all very un-necessary and diverts attention from the real issues. Wish they would pack it in which ever side is doing it

So questions
- SCMP is a percentage of turnover or a percentage of cash received, it would appear to be the latter? There could be large differences between the two. Certainly there will be in terms of non turnover figures that can be used like player sales and staged payments
- player budget is that the budget set by the SCMP calculation or what they can afford to be self sufficient?
- we already know the SCMP budget does not include certain playing staff so does the £2m include all or exclude any playing staff?
- Even if you accept TF assertion that we must own our ground is it beyond the wit of man to put on events in the interim that generate vital Turnover/Cash to count towards the SMCP calculation?
- this meeting was in April when is the next one, why are they not monthly any more?
- why does it take so long to get proper answers from the club especially in terms of finances?
- Has the consumer credit licence now been progressed? If so does that mean an interest charge will be levied on any instalments? As of March 2015 there is an exemption so long as no interest charged. Is not having a licence a method of front loading income?
- the club has reduced all ticket prices, what is the level of attendance needed just to stand still with last year in terms of income?

- I asked the FL about other income sources and would they count towards the SMCP calculation, this is the reply I got
“Generally, income is included when it is wholly attributable to Football Operations. Therefore, a club would not be able to include property income from other fixed assets outside of the football company.

If the Club had conferencing/hospitality income that was directly linked to the football club but was held in a different company, this could be included. However we should stress that each club’s operations are reviewed on a case by case basis and generally structures are discussed with clubs in instances where income is generated from differing operations.”
That suggests that whilst there is scrutiny the rules are not rigid and are open to negotiation, FL discretion now where have we heard that?
 
Last edited:

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
Sadly TM will be hamstrung financially by the failures of all his predecessors, if he really does pull this off on a shoestring it will one of his finest moments in management.

True, but the wage budget for the season just gone was £2m which put us in the upper quartile of L1 clubs when compared to the FLs benchmarking. If we're gonna sell more STs this year (non-scientifically judging by the TM factor when he signed) surely we're still going to be in that upper quartile? Hardly hamstrung when compared to the rest of the division.
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
JB asked if it would be possible to play videos games before kick off to get the crowd going. KC advised this wouldn't be possible as there is a copyright on videos.

JB advised The next golf day is 4 June and will be held at Stoneleigh Deer Park.

How about...f*&k the next golf day off and pay some minimal copyright fees to show the footage that fans want to see???
 

matesx

Well-Known Member
sound more like a chimp's tea party than a professional meeting
 

LB87ccfc

Member
Well theirs 5 minutes of my life I will never get back, What a utter load of old shit that group / meetings really are.
 

wince

Well-Known Member
the club has reduced all ticket prices, what is the level of attendance needed just to stand still with last year in terms of income
That is the big question I was , wondering , that and why there is nothing in the club shop to buy , the two main sources of income , seem to have been slashed , they are probably two of the only things that the club can control
 

skybluesam66

Well-Known Member
2014 season tickets were sold at 209/315
2015 season tickets at 249

4500 sold in 2014
6000 targetted in 2015

if we say 75% full price in those numbers and ignore the rest
then we have an extra 150k v last year on season tickets
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
2014 season tickets were sold at 209/315
2015 season tickets at 249

4500 sold in 2014
6000 targetted in 2015

if we say 75% full price in those numbers and ignore the rest
then we have an extra 150k v last year on season tickets

6000 is probably unrealistic, the last sales figure made public was under 3000 (and that 4 days after the 2000 mark was announced, so I'd imagine it is more like 2300 max). In 2 weeks the prices go up.
http://coventryobserver.co.uk/sport...s-fans-as-season-ticket-sales-pass-2000-7815/
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
6000 is probably unrealistic, the last sales figure made public was under 3000 (and that 4 days after the 2000 mark was announced, so I'd imagine it is more like 2300 max).

Its pretty disappointing that in a city with a population of over 300K we can't shift 6K season tickets when they are only £250.

Portsmouth has a population of 200K, had a a bad season and were in danger of dropping out of the league at some points. They are on course to sell 10K season tickets despite them being £70 more than ours in a lower division.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Is it normal to be two meetings behind in the minutes? Or will we get the May report quicker?

Let's be honest - in the council land you worship - any sort of minutes would be a step forward.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Deflection!

How is that a deflection? I care nothing for the SCG. However, they open themselves up for scrutiny by publishing minutes. When our council loving friend was questioned about the lack of minutes from the council at certain key events he stated that if there is no legal requirement what is the issue.

So the body that is accountable to the electorate can hide in secrecy and that's fine and dandy from council boy.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
How is that a deflection? I care nothing for the SCG. However, they open themselves up for scrutiny by publishing minutes. When our council loving friend was questioned about the lack of minutes from the council at certain key events he stated that if there is no legal requirement what is the issue.

So the body that is accountable to the electorate can hide in secrecy and that's fine and dandy from council boy.

Like too many on here his loyalty to his council knows no bounds. First they are happy to destroy Coventry's sporting traditions ad now they are even happier to become a suburb of Birmingham.

As one of the brain cell sharers said on here before: "Up the Council!!"
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Wasps not a Coventry team ?
Surely another few months should seal it for all but a few?

I long for the days when we had passionate support, your sort wouldn't have lasted 5 minutes.

Just waiting for noggin to come along now and moan at all italia for wumming.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top