BrisbaneBronco
Well-Known Member
What can we expect from this. I have no idea, discuss.
Back to Court on Wednesday 8th July 2015 (25 Viewers)
- Thread starter BrisbaneBronco
- Start date
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
More appeals when they lose again (if they can) and probably more from Judge Fisher saying they got the decision wrong again.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Who knows? Who cares?
Ultimately win, lose or draw it won't change jack at CCFC.
Ultimately win, lose or draw it won't change jack at CCFC.
Kingokings204
Well-Known Member
Remember this appeal is based on the result being "wrong in law and in fact. " the appeal is obviously therefore a shoe in. Only fisher could say this quote above.
Almost as stupid as saying the new stadium plans are 3 weeks away.
Once this loses onto the wasps JR. Such fun
Almost as stupid as saying the new stadium plans are 3 weeks away.
Once this loses onto the wasps JR. Such fun
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
that will help with the rent negotiations, the only benefit I could see if we will drop the legal stuff if you give us a good rent deal.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Sounds like a SISU plan. Doing the same things expecting different results.
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
It can only to be to save face and look tough otherwise why is this mad woman carrying on with this farce.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I go back to my original post on this thread.
Who knows? Who cares? Ultimately it will change nothing for CCFC.
Kingokings204
Well-Known Member
Yes I think they have said as much that they have been battered in court so much they had to appeal and appeal and appeal. They are still wrong though and most likely despite what they say spunking ccfc money in the courts. Appeals can't be cheap.
The new stadium seems to have gone very quiet not that it was never loud anyway. We all know it's clear bs.
Be surprised if it took 2 hours to decide this appeal result.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Well either they will win, which would seem unlikely with their track record, which will just mean more court action to follow or they'll lose which will mean the launch of JR2 and more court action.
Don't think we'll get much new information, will probably just be a yes or no to the appeal won't it?
Don't think we'll get much new information, will probably just be a yes or no to the appeal won't it?
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
Spot on, then 2 more years of SISU dragging anyone and everyone through the courts, followed by another 'hurt' they seek a JR on.
Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
Sounds a bit like blackmail.. :thinking about: (I'm sure it isn't in law and in fact).
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
We could ask Judge Fisher
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
this seems about right to me ........ although the judges might on the day not give a verdict but set a date by which they will
Do not see how it will change anything at CCFC or provide leverage in any tenancy agreement at the Ricoh
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
Will these appeals and new cases ever end? Surely at some point somebody has to say enough is enough.
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
only person that can really do that is Ms Seppala and she seems to revel in legal actions.......... sadly I think there will be more to come
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
You would think the constant losing would start to get you down but she does seem to have skin like a rhino
robbiethemole
Well-Known Member
is this the American way of constant litigation until the claimee folds up and gives in?? I dont understand what benefit can be gained now even if the Judge turns over the decisions of, how many, 5 previous judges, I cant see that being a good advert for British establishment. its a complete waste of time and money.
rupert_bear
Well-Known Member
What if they win ?
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I guess they get to appeal the JR. Doesn't mean the appeal will be successful and the JR will be rerun. This is just an appeal to have the right to appeal the JR if I understand it correctly.
Terry Gibson's perm
Well-Known Member
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
If they win all they win is the right to appeal. Its the appeal itself that they would need to win. If they somehow managed to do that then the only think I can realistically see them being able to do is go after CCC for compensation.
dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
I imagine the threshold is lower to win the right to appeal. Despite every man and their dog warning them against it. They will probably win again. Then get a kicking at court be advised again to leave it at that. Pay the council's costs. Then start JR2. When they complete the full cycle again on that one. In about 2 years time when we are still in division three. They may walk away and we may get owners who want to spend that million pounds spent in court feeds on a playing squad that leads to a trebling In season ticket sales and dare I say it success on the pitch
ohitsaidwalker king power
Well-Known Member
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Are you any more an expert in judicial reviews than Tim Fisher?
In fairness to him he's stating the grounds on which the appeal is being made
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Here's to hoping!
Kingokings204
Well-Known Member
No I'm not FP. I'm just going by the results and the stuff that came out in the JR case and it seemed pretty condemning to me.
I'm no fan of either party sisu or the council but it's seems clear there isn't a case and it's wasted money and I just pray it's not ccfc money but no doubts it is.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
From his statement after the result of the JR was summed up by the judge I think its fair to say that most people are more of an expert on JR's than TF.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Are you an expert Tony?
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
No more than you. Actually scrub that. I didn't suggest that SISU lost the JR on purpose.