RATINGS FOLKS v Notts Forest (1 Viewer)

Murphy - 7
Christie - 7+
Keogh - 7+
Wood - 8
Hussey - 7+
KLingan - 7
Bell - 7
Thomas - 7
Deegan - 7+
Juke - 7
PLatt - 7

Subs

Gael - 6
Cameron -6
Dunne - 6+
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Murphy 8
Christie 7
Keogh 7
Wood 8
Hussey 5
Clingan 6
Bell 6
Deegan 6
Thomas 6
Juke 7
Platt 6

brigi - 6 for small part he did play
cameron - 7
dunn 5-didnt come out for anything,but hey didnt have much time to bed in
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Murphy - 7
Christie - 7+
Keogh - 7+
Wood - 8
Hussey - 7+
KLingan - 7
Bell - 7
Thomas - 7
Deegan - 7+
Juke - 7
PLatt - 7

Subs

Gael - 6
Cameron -6
Dunne - 6+


Think we might be getting a little carried away here. Don't anyone forget just how very ordinary we were in the first half. Don't think giving all scores of either 7 or 8 reflects that does it. These sorts of scores surely would only be warranted for a 90 minute performance, or at least a 70 or 75 minute one., not just a 45 minute one.

First half only Keogh and Wood looked anything like good.
 

cooperskyblue

Well-Known Member
Murphy 6
Keogh 7
Christie 7
Hussey 6
Wood 8
Clingan 7
Bell 6
Deegan 7
Thomas 6
Jutkiewicz 8
Platt 6

Subs:
Bigi 5
Dunn 6
Cameron 6
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
For what it's worth .....


Murphy 6.5
Christie 7
Keogh 7
Wood 8
Hussey 6.5
Clingan - 6
Bell - 6
Deegan - 7.5
Thomas - 6.5
Juke - 7
Platt - 7
 

Macca

Well-Known Member
haha.

Strangley the degree to which the club has changed over the last 6 years means that I'm able to take things so much less seriously now than I used too.

Everything post 2005 is all a bit Coventry Utd Dons to me.

The league table doesn't lie as they say we're almost as good as last year:whistle:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top