Cole set to stay til January. (3 Viewers)

D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
Qualification from TM "Without anything being concrete, we are in discussions and will try to take it to January"
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Has to be long term, or completely pointless having him for just a month - he was always going to need time to get up to speed.
 

jim20

Well-Known Member
I think if he gets up to speed we need to keep him until the end of the season, along with a few others including Armstrong and Kent. If we can do that, or TM replaces them if they go in Jan with as good as or better we will have a good second half of the season as well
 

Specs WT-R75

Well-Known Member
Interesting how it is going to work with 6 loans when Turner arrives.

Seems quite straight forward to me... either Cole will start and Bigi will miss out, or when Cole is not fit enough to start, he won't be in the squad and Bigi will be on the bench.

Possible that Cole, Bigi and Kent get rotated a bit when we have 3 games in a week, or shall I say Cole plays one game and the others play 2/3 each!
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
The positive to Cole's fitness is opposition managers never know if he'll be playing.
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
Keeping Cole is only good news. I don't think money has had a big part to play in this whatsoever. Tallent like that can choose which club he plays for, and I think he has. When he does finally become fit and shakes off those niggles from coming back from major injury, he is going to be a legend for us.

Can see this going longer then just January.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Not too bothered about what the plan is. TM has put a decent team together on a pittance. Next season if we go up he will have much more money to spend. It doesn't seem right as we are Coventry City.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
SW must have come back for a day to sort this out. I have it on "good" authority that JC was his parting gift :pointlaugh:
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Fair play to the club once again, just need to get the stadium situation sorted, and dare I say it, we will be being run not to shabbily at the moment.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Fair play to the club once again, just need to get the stadium situation sorted, and dare I say it, we will be being run not to shabbily at the moment.

This season has been a step change. Hope it's not just Mowbray's influence and it's someone on the board so this continues even if TM leaves.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Let's hope so! The club certainly showed massive ambition getting him in and retaining him, they deserve credit for that.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
This season has been a step change. Hope it's not just Mowbray's influence and it's someone on the board so this continues even if TM leaves.

tbf, scattergun signing policy aside, I've not had much of an issue with how the club's been run (bar Northampton! and the ticketing stupidity - OK as I put this, maybe I *do* have a fair few issues with how the club's run:thinking about:) since Dulieu left.

Take away the elephants in the room and, even if they haven't worked out, managerial choices have been sound in Robins, Pressley and Mowbray, as has the general principle of backing a manager and keeping an academy going.
 

Great_Expectations

Well-Known Member
This season has been a step change. Hope it's not just Mowbray's influence and it's someone on the board so this continues even if TM leaves.

I think the very fact they initially recruited TM and ultimately persuaded him to re-sign indicates a change of strategy from SISU. Couple that with the fact they allowed him to create a Director of Football position and appoint his own man into it.

As the season has progressed the backing they must be providing (compare our current squad to last years) and the decision to work in the background to not distract from football matters, demonstrates further positive signs.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top