This was amongst one of the articles on/in the telegraph:
" It's also understood to be one of the most lucrative deals yet for the football club in terms of their share of revenue from matchday car parking as well and food and beverages. "
Meaning the deal, not only being a decent length but...
It's goals that will save us not clean sheets. More dropped points today. MR can only work with the talent we have and it's simply not good enough at this level.
I'd rather lose by two or three and attack than resigned to 0-0 defensive draws, little action and even less hope. MR has to turn...
I thought Sunderland were quite poor, long ball team without any real quality and a manager who loves whinging. We were only uncomfortable by our own mistakes and unfortunate missed chances. The run continues and that's what will get us over the line, keep on building that inevitably of a goal...
You have deliberately sought inference as an excuse to duck scrutiny of your wildly inaccurate personal slurs. I take your dismissal as admitting your comments were completely false.
Still insulting my character and not my argument. Stay classy.
Am I right in thinking you are referring to this post:
Or a different one? I can't reply until you clarify where you specifically pointed out the hypocrisy (of my reply).
Quote exactly where I said as such. A deliberate strawman.
It is entirely the point and entirely correct. You expect and demand that the Telegraph should be building bridges whilst doing nothing yourself.
That's pretty funny. Still an ad hominem though. Got anything relevant to say?