Recent content by Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Isn't that a good thing? A competitive division where games could go any way? For me the problem with la Liga is Barca and RM have far too much power and financial clout.

If he played like that every week they've be no need for him to flip the bird cos we wouldn't even be having the debate. My take is that he's a bit unhappy at being dropped to the bench. And why I think Lampard has mismanaged the strikers. Simms thrives on confidence, and Lampard dropped him...

Could somebody clear something up for me? Earlier in this thread someone was talking about the problem being that Grimes, Torp and Rudoni all play in a straight line hence the problems with finding each other and why it's so easy for teams to get around us. But I've seen lots of complaints...

Nah, I think that'd be curtains for him.

Given the amount of lying, backstabbing and self interest, maybe the prize for the winner of the Traitors should be a place in Parliament, and thus end up increasing attention on affairs of state among the general population?

Why I instantly dismissed it as bullshit.

I prefer Yang Min Style as it's supposedly his favourite song. But I'd happily take the Village people over generic shite.

Indeed. Why take on complete unknowns to balls-up running the country when you can have people who've already got experience of ballsing up running the country.

Having the opportunity to take him off after 70 minutes where possible so he's not having to play 90 minutes every game just makes sense. It's not just the physical, it's the mental strain too. We can't do that right now. Even Alex Ferguson used to rotate his best players when they were showing...

Because we have some form of cover for Torp in the form of Eccles and, to an extent, Allen. We have no-one that plays the same way as Grimes. And it's all very well saying 'he never gets injured'. Same argument was used for O'Hare. Until he did get injured. To not have someone there to fill...

Peado

I don't want the AI. I'm just pointing out that if you were to look at it entirely unemotionally and independent of any bias towards any particular species, as you would expect technology to do, then its conclusion would be 'Too many humans'. I also assume it wouldn't kill us all off as, like...

But isn't the potential problem that AI only truly becomes useful when we don't have to check it? In effect it becomes sentient. At which point we're no longer necessary. If AI ever became sentient in that manner, I think the only possible sensible conclusion it could come to is that there...