Recent content by Sky_Blue_Dreamer

So you're agreeing that the BBC are impartial then.

Massive cuts in public spending as they cut taxes so the few services they do get get scaled back or even taken away. Stagnant or falling wages mixed in with rising prices as they back their buddies in big business. Increased use of private sector in providing public services increasing the cost...

IDK.

Like having the likes of farage on giving his opinion far more often than his political backing warranted? Oh no, then it was to 'provide a balanced view' wasn't it...

Why would we go to all that trouble (and potential expense if you want to pay up his contract) to bring in another CH? At that point does Woolfenden become our fourth choice CB and not getting a game, so we should go through the same procedure with him at that point? A fourth choice CB isn't...

I'm just telling you the facts of what I've found while working there. I don't speak to everyone in that community and of those that I do most we've never touched on the subject of politics. Frankly I don't bring it up as its a surefire way of creating tension. But of those that choose to talk...

Why? Shouldn't everyone have to have the integrity to not misrepresent the facts and not mislead the public? Or is it OK if someone's bankrolling you to just do what you like? If the BBC was funded by left leaning activists would it be have been OK for them to have gone even further in...

And why should they? When Trump tells lies and told to apologise, he just doesn't do it and attacks whoever it was telling him to apologise. Trump doesn't have even 1% of the integrity and impartiality of the BBC.

But if you did get rid of VAT on energy you can almost guarantee those companies will hike prices so bills don't actually come down. The fact they're making obscene amounts of profit already tells you they could make the cost of energy cheaper, they're choosing not to. They'd rather put that...

So people who have barely any money and can't afford a place to live or food to eat should get taxed? For me, the PA is there (or at least should be there) to cover the basics. You should be able to afford somewhere to live, be able to keep it warm and feed yourself before you pay any tax.

Well for a start we've got far more people buying houses to rent out as an income stream. So you've got even higher demand than you would have if people wanted them just to live in. As it's a business proposition as well they'll also offer a bit more if needed because they will be able to cover...

So what other issues are they cutting through on? As you seem to understand why people support Reform on points other than 'it's all foreigners' fault', why not explain it to us? What are these other points? I work in area with a very diverse socio-economic population and I have to interact...

So as long as we improve our batting, bowling and fielding we'll be ok.

Not sure if that's deliberate or not. Either way, I like it.