Search results

Can only say what I saw. Watched him play a lot for Dale and his potential was obvious. I do admit however that having had my hopes raised probably does inflate my opinion of him now. I still think we shouldn't let him go unless we are bringing another striker in first.

I suppose that's fair comment. I still find the whole situation puzzling though

So why say anything at all?

I don't understand why though. Why big him up in that interview, why keep him around the squad when we could easily have signed a replacement in the summer. Makes no sense

I don't buy that, there's been multiple opportunities to move him on or end his contract/sign a replacement but he's still here and making the bench. I saw his potential when he was still a Rochdale player and I'm convinced there is still a player in there.

Personally I'd rather see him given a chance

He's the only striker option from the bench currently

Tav loan doesn't make sense unless we bring in a starting striker

It was one factor amongst a multitude.

No it didn't.

That's an example of a specific freedom of speech, not of absolute freedom of speech which is what you were advocating.

Give one specific example of how absolute freedom of speech would improve society

Firstly, you didn't ask me to explain that, bu as you have now asked the answer is quite simple, race is a protected characteristic under UK law and there are highly defined rules around what constitutes hate speech: "Any communication which is threatening or abusive, and is intended to harass...

You do realise you just gave a textbook definition of whataboutery? You can't help yourself.

Stop the whataboutery, it really doesn't help.

You wouldn't agree that what Greggs posted was hate speech? Struggling to understand the justification if that is what you're saying.

It was going well till the last line 👀

TBF the January window would be much more interesting if they did 😁

Which words tripping you up fella?