Search results

It's the same myth the Tories have been trotting out forever, that it is possible to resolve decades of chronic underinvestment in the NHS, with reform. (See also council funding, education, etc. etc.) No government in the last twenty years has been able to do it, it's a fiction.

Exactly that. We should never forget that Netanyahu supported Hamas for precisely that reason. https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/

It's the classic Tory argument, which should worry anyone who supports Labour. The truth is that the NHS has been underfunded for a decade or more compared to our peers, and the current problems are a direct result of that. If you've got a leaky bucket because you've let it rust for 15-20...

As for why there's support for Hamas amongst Palestinians and potentially elsewhere, here's an interesting Jewish perspective on it, also from the JC. In short, the author argues this doesn't end without some sort of commitment to a two-state solution from Israel...

I think the answer to your question, Pete, is that it might be based on a flawed assumption (i.e. that educated Muslims are ignoring 'facts') based on a single, potentially biased study. I don't think that this is one to fall out over, mate. I'd worry more about the motivation of those who try...

Facts. Don't make me laugh. You're either a complete troll or just incredibly dim. Pretty sad either way. I think you're probably just desperately looking for attention, rather than believing the bullshit you're spouting, but just in case, here's a simple explanation of why you're wrong...

Entirely irrelevant bunch of waffle. You're flapping a bit now mate, so let's keep it simple. Just answer one question, it's not a hard one so there's no need to panic, love... Does Braverman describe herself as specialising in Judicial Review. Yes or no?

At least the school I went to taught reading comprehension (and additionally, how not to look like a arrogant knob). Braverman herself states that she specialises in Judicial Review, you admit this yourself. Therefore it's not unreasonable to describe her as a Judicial Review lawyer in the...

And in the meantime, a handy explainer on international humanitarian law as it applies to Israel. It doesn't really mention accidents. Unsurprisingly, there's a large body of qualified legal opinion that suggests Israel is in breach of it - this includes four former supreme court judges. Bit...

Much as it painted me to do it, Braverman's description of herself is as a barrister specialising in "judicial review". (Link below, warning, basic reading comprehension required...) As for lmfao, there's nothing funnier than a 50p troll on here pretending to be some kind of legal expert. Do...

In fairness, it looks a hefty tome. At least we'll be able to burn it to keep warm, should she ever get back into a position of power.

Can someone do me a Taggart, "There's been an insult", gif, please. 😁

You'd never believe a furry bunny could be so accurate with a mini-gun. 😄 Sorry mate, as you can guess I have literally no useful suggestions (no change there). I quite liked Animal Crossing, but I get exactly where you're coming from. There's not much jeopardy in it, unless you let one of...

Animal Crossing. 😁 (Edit: The Black Ops version, obviously)

Conservatives have values now? 😁 Liz Truss is the best example I can bring to hand, of someone who is too thick to actually realise they're thick. Fair play though, it must take ages to write a book when you have to move your lips whilst you're doing it. At least in the old days the Tories...

Until Wasps are involved, I'm never going to believe this stadium will happen. 😁

Either you believe in the rule of law, or you don't. It's not the dark ages. You're aligning yourself with Putin here. Think about that for a moment. As for warm, comfy cells, spent any time in prison have you? Read about it at all, other than in the Daily Mail? Thought not.

Ah, the laughing emoji. The one that says I can't answer the question so I'll just poke fun at it and hope no one notices.

I think there's a list of Starmer's commitments when he ran for leader posted earlier. I'll bet good money that also earlier in this thread you've said it was ok that he's ditched them. Electoral hygiene, you said. It's ok to drop everything he promised to champion earlier as long as he wins...

Let's start with some of the pledges that Starmer signed up to when elected leader shall we? They were broadly centre-left, is the party still committed to those, I must've missed it...