Search results

Yes Italy would be out

Is he a burden ?

No keeper gets near that.

Because football is a game where play moves quickly around the pitch

Full control

2 match dive ban ?

yes it is on

or play Sheaf in a traditional sweeper role, that he would suit better

the ball was on the ground (could see from tv) the issue is the overhang of the part of the ball not on the ground, where around 1cm overhung the virtual line (not necessarily the actual line)

When Maatsen gave them the ball back from the throwing and they chose not to go for it - we should have really capitalised on that and gone to attack . It was their choice to leave the ball there . Worse when we then gave it back to the keeper, he just stood looking at it

i think established the goal line is irrelevant, they are set up in line with the posts (which should be aligned - but maybe margin of error)

so the 9 inch ball has to be fully over the 5 inches goalline a total of 14 inches or 35 CM apparently 1cm was not over so - 97% in , but not the 3 % that mattered. Also the line has to be the exact width of the post, as they dont go on the line at all, but the actual posts - so it is...

correct - also got one at sunderland in promotion season

and some have been blatant - the one at Blackburn where Gyok ended up properly injured

measuring the still the line is 12cm wide maximum we are talking about 1cm from a goal - however it was much more of a goal than one which won England the world cup :)

I think that’s the issue. The margin is so fine it is possibly over the line but not the virtual line. We are talking about 2mm. I blame the groundsman

changed my mind

also the ball is on the ground,

100% a goal - watch this , was in for around 2 seconds

4-4-2