Search results

I've had many an abusive comment thrown at me on here (including the C word). I've reported them, but nothing gets done.

Fair enough Dave - IIRC correctly, the (1), (2) and (3) were to denote "related parties" rather than the party being sued though. Likewise Dave - I actually played for the Internet SBA team back in the day. Went up a few times to a tournament called Worldnet in Leeds and used to play the local...

That's just wrong Nick. Did you read the information I posted, or are you deliberately playing dumb? Do you need me to post the text from the EU website again in a bigger font? Scenario 1. EU finds against CCC. Fine issued. CCC pay fine. End of case, no court appearance Scenario 2. EU finds...

That's not what I said Nick - here's what I said. As I've also stated, not all judgements are made in a court. If the Council have done wrong and the EU commission find against them and issue a fine, the process could end there with no appearance in court for anyone. If any judgement (for or...

Beggy? Give your head a wobble. If people choose to interact with me or ignore me, that's up to them. If you've found a single tweet where I'm 'beggy' please let me know. Tell me, which accounts are 'from the Council'? I see Fletcher pop up occasionally, but I don't follow him and he doesn't...

This will be the same club that Joy said she liquidate if she didn't get her own way, yeah? PS. The council made some shit decisions, but I don't believe it was ever their intention to kill the club. We were going to get a new ground weren't we, just outside the City boundaries.

Of course it is. How have you spun my words to make them mean that?

Up to you Nick - if you're happy being a c**t about it for just the sake of being a c**t, that's up to you. I think I joined the Warwick University CCFC Internet Mailing list in 1989 or so and several of the users of that service are still on it and are still on here. I had a good chat in that...

How is it spin? It's from the EU commission website. It's a process to determine whether a law has been breached. You know, looking at the legal implications of a public body to determine if they've broken the law. Says it there in black and white. Not all legal judgements are passed in a court.

I've explained to you before Nick - I don't come on here to talk about the football - I have other places where I do that. My friends and family who attend StA aren't interested in the politics, so I don't discuss that with them I do chat to them about the game though. I use twitter and this...

It's an investigation into a possible breach of competition law. Thererefore a legal process. Competition: opening markets to competition - European Commission

They've never sued Wasps. Only CCC. Wasps would have to foot the bill though.

That's not correct. It only gets to a court if the EU judgement against a breach of competition laws is appealed. Competition: opening markets to competition - European Commission What are the consequences? The Commission investigates whether companies are violating or could potentially violate...

So Fisher and Boddy both calling them legals isn't enough for you?

I've already stated many times I think the indemnity is a stupid thing to do and I don't agree with it. I can however, see why they've done it. When you say the club met the original terms, I'm not sure that's true. Wasps asked for an end to all legals and that there would be no more cases...

Where am I defending Wasps Nick? I still find it amusing that you think I'm doing this to in some way impress someone who I think is a bit of a knob. You just can't get away from thinking that I'm in some way in cahoots with the Council. It's brilliantly batty. Even Grendel, having found out...

You'll have a long wait. However, if you read the detail on the EU Commission website, you'll find the talking about how their work is to apply judgement based on the law and that if a party doesn't agree with the judgement, an appeal (based on point of law) can be heard in the EU court. Why are...

People who've called it "legals": Fisher, Boddy, Eastwood, Rupert Lowe MEP and many, many more. People who are clinging to it not being legals, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary and failing to understand it makes no difference whatsover: MalcSB

Try this quote from Eastwood, Nick. "We further understand that the basis of the complaint to the EU is very similar in all matters of substance to the recent court actions, questions those court decisions and seeks remedial action. "Regrettably, this means that the condition set out above for...

Perfectly able to process all of this thanks Nick. You stated facts, I agree. However in the context of the point I originally made, I don't understand why. These points are already well understood. I made the point that "there would be no deal whilst there were legals" and you decided it was...