Search results

Just so long as you didn't have to watch the match you mean? Trifle harsh. I'd probably watch if it was free

Where did you get this nugget of information from? Was it broadcast? Or off social media?

What part of "General Discussion/Off-topic Chat" do you find so difficult to understand? When you've been here a bit longer than 6 days maybe you'll get cut some slack, but for now keep your opinions about the site to yourself.

Johnson now claiming that "no-one told him" the drinks party at No 10 wasn't within the rules. He presided over a government that, following advice, set the fucking rules. He then told the country precisely what we had to do to follow the rules. He's either a lying c**t or he is utterly...

The only place you can view the documents free are National Records Office in Kew, National Library of Wales in Aberystwyth or Manchester Central Library. Findmypast are saying they have to charge to recoup the outlay in transcribing the original census documents. I’ll just buy a few of the key...

Just found out that you have to cough up the annual Pro subscription (the princely some of £160) to get access to the 1921 records without having to pay for each entry you want to view. Bit of a con for a public record, in my view!

To be honest, i've been playing and watching football my entire life and i am no longer sure i know the offside rule - the way it is officiated these days, anyhow!!

I wish the OB had opened fire on "David Irving". What a complete wanker - though that might explain what he means by "we came together"

I heard that was @SkyBlueDaz 's fault - he gets blamed for everything!!!

I didn't say that the claimant in this case had consented, by all accounts. And she does allege that one of the offences did take place in London. But WHY didn't she go after Randy Andy at the same time as Epstein (i.e. in 2009) - it's that part i don't get. And i am NOT defending him.

Epstein or DOY?

Don't get me wrong, i think he may well be involved (though don't forget that consensual sex with a 17 year old is not illegal in this country), but if i was on his defence team, i'd be asking why the claimant didn't start proceedings against him in 2009 when she had a case open against Epstein...

Fucking W*sps beating Tigers

In a similar vein, people who are either too stupid (or their car too clever) to put lights on in poor visibility. Fancy new cars will often have day-running headlights so people think they don't need to turn their lights on themselves, but they usually DON'T turn the rear lights on...

It'll be interesting to see how long it is until Ancestry.org get access to the 1921 census, as i have learnt quite a lot through them. The other good resource is the 1939 register which was conducted with the impending threat of war. Downside it doesn't include anyone who is still alive. I have...

Sadly a lot of the elected councillors (who voted on the decisions) are still there - the likes of Maton and O'Boyle spring to mind!

I presume that isn't the euphemism he'll be subjected to if Ms Maxwell throws him under the bus!!!

They are still "legal proceedings" though, Grendel. Just civil rather than criminal. You still take "legal action" against someone if you are suing them for libel, for example.

Just wait till they show the WOMEN's African Cup of Nations!!

I can't remember when i last heard someone being referred to as a twerp! PMSL