Search results

Both of Dabo's yellows look harsh to me. For the first, he was clearly watching the ball and going for a header. For the second, it's not even clear to me that it hit his arm - could well be the edge of the chest. Both of Kastaneer's are deffo yellows though.

hoorah! it's back.

Is it January Jones (Winter)? She's got her full combat kit on in this clip.

What does that even mean? When the players get together where, for coffee? And why does he jump in? He'll spill the drinks and someone will get a nasty scald.

His first is in grin but not in smile His second is in inch but not in mile. He can spin forever without getting dizzy. Can you riddle me ree? I have no bloody idea who it is, but this seems about the level of this thread. Is it fucking Rumpelstiltskin?

We're not blocking their path; we are creating competition and mitigating for the fact that not all of them will progress as we hope they might. We can loan and it seems to be a production line of those who succeed being sold - opening up opportunities for the next wave. It's not like we have...

Perhaps the CIA hacked Twitter to put it onto your feed? They are feeding you clues...

I'm sure you are right.

I believe that I wrote that it was 'perhaps an opportunity'. A far cry from insisting we mix things up now.

I agree. Max wins almost everything in the air that comes to him. If he can get the same understanding with Godden as he forged with McWankty, he could turbo-drive Godden's goal count.

All three are good. Perhaps an opportunity to play 3 central defenders to free up wing-backs to attack more?

Didn't see the game but have seen the highlights (really just the goals) this morning. It struck me how much space we had when driving forward - especially for Dabo's run. Any views on whether Exeter just weren't defending well in midfield or is this the start of the counter-attacking game...

Surely not? He was in the crowd yesterday!

OK. Well say hello to Cabbage-Stump Charlie for me.

Well, let's leave it there. It seems we agree on much - and what we don't agree on is conjecture which we both accept as such. Have a lovely evening. Going to the game?

1. All billionaires are different, so we cannot determine how he might behave from his wealth. 2. Can find no suggestion anywhere that he was a narcissist. 3. A billionaire that had already attempted suicide only a few days previously... then succeeds. Not beyond the realms of...

I'm with Baz on this; Occam's Razor and all that. There's far too much fabrication and imagination being used for political ends. Nowadays, it seems that a cigar is never just a cigar.

I know. But try and put yourself in his position, *if* he had been partaking in Epstein's very special hospitality. You'd not mention anything would you? Craziest thing in the world if you know that he's arranging under-age sex parties, is to go on record praising the man. On the other hand...

You asked why it's Clinton for the conspiracy theory; I've explained as I best understand it. If there were a conspiracy, and I put no credence on such evidence-void tittle-tattle whatsoever, then Bill Clinton appears to have greater motive (given his 27 visits to the Lolita Express). I don't...

I don't go in for unsubstantiated conspiracy theories myself. However I believe that: - From flight logs, Bill Clinton was a regular guest on flights where abuse is alleged to have taken place (27 times according to some). There is a single record of Trump on such a flight, although Epstein...