Search results

I don't believe anything that they say Dongo, but my feeling is somewhere something has to give, and I don't think it will be with the Ricoh, so what are our options?

Is falling for it accepting that there is the possibility of a viable stadium there? Because if so I have fallen for it...but that there is the possibility for a viable sports stadium, not whether it is suitable for CCFC. But if there was a scenario if it was there or leave the city I would take...

Don't be harsh, Mutton is gutted ;)......like anyone cares. Using a Captain Dart line 'Does that help the football club? No it doesn't'

Residents do have a say but most planning projects these days this has little recourse.

I'm not sure Otis. I think Wasps will always struggle, and they are whores to money. Lets not forget Derek Richardson bought he lease to line his own pockets first and foremost. Rugby is cyclical and they are currently near the top of the cycle, they will be on the downward slope in the future...

You are unbelievable. You state a fact its wrong, that 'all Premier League teams have a wage cap of 6.5 million' and I call you out for the rubbish that that is, and as per normal the Italia line comes out that I am missing the point. What is the point? as from what I can read its a one line...

I remember Brighton's plight well, not too dissimilar to ours in absolute shite owners and moved around from pillar to post. I have watched how they have developed since and know that with the right owners we will have potential...whenever that happens. I totally agree with your sentiments...

Isn't every fact on here estimated. That's why when someone states 'Fact' it is so laughable. We would still all argue whichever.

I predict we will argue on SBT especially over issues where people state 'Fact' I also predict Italia will bang on about Wasps and then state he has never whored on their behalf. As for for your questions, 1) Ricoh then Butts 2) Upper mid table Div 2 3) Sisu then several bids from different...

No they don't, they can pay extra for marquee signings as well, and if you think Wasps like Saracens aren't breaking the cap you are deluded, which judging by your usual posts you clearly are. You clearly don't know a great deal about this game you love so much.

Nicely side stepped the Wycombe Wasps and Coventry Wasps analogy there ;)

Depends on the debt. Depends if they can pay it back. Getting low attendances but being solvent is better than a big shiny stadium, loads of free tickets and tacky flags and being insolvent, isn't it.

Unless Financial markets give it a low (poor rating) as a risk to get your money back and then people will invest elsewhere. Have seen it happen and follow these events with my onw investments. You will try to bat this off, but if its the case it doesn't bode well for Wasps...... Good!

Pot and kettle. Now you know how I feel, and why I have to keep pointing it out to you. You know I only do it out to help your postings improve. Tell you what when you contribute more than the old clichés I will contribute meaningfully on your posts ;)

Its sad. Says more about them than us. I wonder how they are going to deal with their financial meltdown? Still to be honest I don't really care.

Its for old times. We go back a long way to the long past of the CET forum. ;)

No, just Italia. ;) Anyone who has accused you of being such was very misplaced.

Why don't you grow up and stop accusing anyone who disagrees with your turgid monotonies that they either agree with Tim or are a Sisu supporter.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha That is the funniest thing you have ever posted, and that is saying something amongst your ramblings.

Probably some shit about a pie and a pint offer at Wasps games. The man is a fuck awful excuse for a journalist.