Search results

The EFL have stated that the club must return to Cov, regardless of anything else.

Plenty of street parking around the ground - just like there was at Highfield Road where there were no parking facilities at the ground. There is also secure parking a 15 minute walk from St Andrew's. Street parking around Highfield Road never caused a problem, even in the 1960's where crowds...

Boycotting St.Andrews will serve no useful purpose. It will only harm the club you claim to support and possibly lead to administration and points deduction. The fault lies with Wasps who insist that SISU indemnifies them if the EU find the Council acted wrongly. Don't punish the club for...

Several top flight clubs in Europe share the same stadium. How would we feel about sharing a new stadium with Birmingham at say the NEC ?

Think of the positives instead of the negatives. A decent pitch to play on, not much further to travel for supporters living north, west and south of Coventry outside of Coventry, a decent stadium and facilities, maybe bring in a few new supporters from Birmingham. No longer at the whim of...

As I see it, Wasps have nothing to gain or lose by agreeing a rental agreement with CCFC. The investigation will go ahead regardless of whether an rental is agreed or not. Best to have a rental income whilst the investigation goes ahead than no income at all ?

Reg Matthews from my era, the first Coventry City player from the then 3rd Division to play for England ... on a par with Bill Glazier.

What does everyone think will happen ?

The owners are Otium. He is Chairman of CCFC

CCFC state they have not heard from the owners. As TF is a director of both CCFC and the owners, how come he hasn't heard from himself ? Lol.

My personal preference is 1. I think the Ricoh is tarnished and negative as long as Wasps own it and play there.

1. Play at a shared ground like St Andrew's for 3 years whilst a new stadium is being built at Woodlands 2. Ground share for 12 months giving time for legal to be sorted and return to the Ricoh. 3. Play at the Butts permanently and have the Butts developed. 4. Cave into Wasps and the Council...

Ground share with Birmingham for 3 years, playing on a decent pitch whilst building our own Stadium on the Woodlands site. Worked for Brighton whilst the Amex was being built. Short term pain long term gain. The Ricoh pitch will always represent a ploughed field.

One of the benefits of ground sharing is that we would have a decent pitch to play on unlike the ploughed field at the Ricoh, provided the club we ground share with don't share with egg chasers. On another forum it was suggested we shouldn't punish the team and MR by not going if we ground share...

Cheltenham ? Bang on 50 miles to Wadden Road from the City centre.

We know Burton is one ground, which is the other ? If its Shrewsbury it's too far.

St Andrew's would be ok, but only as a last resort.

Www.rugbytownfc.com - good website, lots of photos.

St.Andrews, they need the money. Nearest ground of comparable size. Easy access. But I still think we will play at the Ricoh next season.

Could it be that SISU feel their appeal will be thrown out ?