Search results

Not sure how’s I have got it wrong. When I am telling you I don’t understand which of the the two options the offer is, having read the article 3 times. Instead of telling me I am wrong why don’t you just actually help me out and tell me which it is. 7 million and the new owners get Ryton or 7...

Think they have a about a year and half to run till SISU finally give up. I can only guess Wasps won’t agree a rent deal and we move elsewhere and crowds drop again putting more pressure of SISU. Shit times ahead I would guess.

They would be picked up by someone who puts the clubs interests first

And some point during the 30 years they did actually care about the club though

I did to be honest and I am still not sure of the wording. If it is 7 million and Ryton stays with SISU. Then I am intrigued who has the extra cash and even more intrigued as to why SISU said no. If it’s is 7 million and new owners get Ryton. Then I get it as that’s where the new 5 million comes...

We all agree but someone their end is either completely delusional or desperate.

That’s my view I feel somewhere along the lines they have been advised ownership will somehow impact on the compensation afterwards. So their plan is to keep it cost neutral until it’s over

Not sure what that means about Ryton. Is it the club keep Ryton and get 7 million up front. Which I assume they would take. Or is it 7 million up front but the buyers get Ryton? Which I imagine the owners wont take as the promise of £20 million depends on them succeeding.

Pretty sure they were £15 if a season ticket holder bought it. Would be nice to know how many took it up

Yes £15 a ticket if you can convince 5 others to go, but everyone who trying to make a point is talking about £10 tickets. So that’s 10 people.

To suggest that if a deal where if you have to get ten mates to come with you and you get a cheaper ticket as proof that if tickets were cheaper more people wouldn’t come is crazy. If tickets are cheaper more people will come that’s a fact of life. However how much cheaper is the important...

And there it is

Yes it probably is especially when we don’t know what the actual costs are. They need to know what price would bring in an extra couple of thousand fans with costing us anything. That would be a very hard thing to get right. Even if we don’t make s profit but don’t make a loss, however get...

Oh we asked stoke for a lower price and they said no? Fair enough, sorry where is that written down again? I know you like your facts and everything. Oh and I was actually pointing out that you have to get the balance and maybe £22 was the cheapest the club could do due to costs. You are right...

People would pay £30 against a Man Utd. People would pay £22 against Villa who are league lower than Stoke. It’s all about supply and demand and getting your pricing structure right. Stoke are not Villa (hated local rivals). They do not have 1/4 of the pull of Man Utd. So it comes back to how...

I am shocked that he wants a manager who he believes is a ‘miracle worker’ sacked. Then again I am not really just shows he did have a clue what he was talking about back then.

We don’t need to do that mate. Nick is never wrong and when he doesn’t agree with afterwards the conversation never even happened. It’s great in his world.

I am trying my best at pointing out to you that you were wrong when you said if we added the best players from the league above to this team we still wouldn’t have won. I am trying my best at pointing out to you that when you add different players to a game with better skills you don’t get the...

I am reading what you are saying and you said if you put the best strikers from the league above into our team yesterday we still would have lost. You don’t understand how introducing the skills of two new players changes how a team plays. Putting Moore and Marriott in our team would have more...