Search results

please explain

No it's a common sense business approach. Why would you bid for CCFC unless you knew you could either build a new stadium in 12 months. Or you provisionally agreed with someone that if you were successful buying CCFC that person would allow them to play there. It's shows they were planning to...

And my lucky council pants. No flags just speaking common sense which when the other person is floundering to deal with that they tend to turn to childish retorts Please explain to me how ACL going bust would not have lost the charity money If Wasps wouldn't buy at that price then you are...

Alternatively they could have allowed as the judge thought ACL to get distressed and go bust. Losing them and Charity a shed load of money and SISU who were causing the distress to benefit. Yes I am sure their decision was based purely on spite. Comments such as these are just the same as...

Seems strange to need a loan with high interest and not sell Stevenson instead who hardly featured after he was not sold. Or Willis who Bristol claim they met our asking price

Add to that, that during all of those comments and plenty of others explicitly saying we are no longer interested in the Ricoh. During this time the leader of the council warned SISU to put their best bid in because the city can not be held to paralysis over this one matter. Effectively she...

Fair play to him Nice to see

Is lifelong fan Nick Owen still chairman?

One very important difference amongst numerous others, under the current ownership the fans probably won't. Under a new ownership the fans probably will.

Two player of the year awards. Including one from ex players

Do you click on Les' articles?

Do you find Les Reid smug?

Yes the headline is designed to make people read. If that's what you call click bait. Then yes it is. The article was worth writing, it is worthwhile news. The spiel at the end is getting the same as Les and the observor and isn't needed

Yes the headline is designed to make you read. Although I think most would have looked anyway if the headline said 'Hoffman denies meeting'

No don't be ridiculous! I am not at home.

I get very confused with who is CEO's, directors, Chairman Of the club, the various businesses involved in the club and the actual business that owns the business that owns the club. Also some people were suggesting that Joys letter meant Mr Fisher was getting replaced. If his role is chairman...

Was that very long sarcastic way of saying Tim Fisher is chairman and the new role will be replacing Anderson?

It is though and in this 5th season of improving communication with fans. It's probably worth speaking to them.

Gotta say and I know I won't be popular on this. I thought it was useful to have it confirmed from Gary Hoffman that he had not met Joy over the weekend. However the rest of the article is the same as what Les Reid does, awhile regurgitation of the history. Totally pointless and just padding...

I would like a bit more Clarification regarding the CEO thing. Tom Fisher is the CEO isn't he? Have I got that wrong? Or was she just talking about replacing Waggot, Anderson, Venus and used the wrong term. The city's most read paper the CET will get ignored (even in this era of better...