Search results

A lot has changed in his credibility of a manager since he was getting poached by us.

He has been out of work for a year. He was sacked by Scunthorpe. Assurances are no longer as important as they are when you have other options.

I have always said if we bring more money to Wasps than we cost them. They are a business and we are there to make money. Unfortunately the rent will have to go up. Tim Fishers arguement about average league one rents (some to become average league 2 rents ) doesn't cut it. You also have to...

The bit in brackets is what I mean when I say unless there is a different option to us that brings in more money., I have never seen us a competitive crowd wise. The way are ranoyr crowds are only going one way unfortunately

Gets him a chance to look at everybody Including hopefully the most prolific striker in the club

If CCFC give Wasps more money than they cost them. If there is not another option that would give Wasps more money than CCFC theywill want them. If CCFC are doing something that could damage Wasps business and Wasps have something we want. They will use that to its maximum to stop SISU...

Do you support JR2 like you supported rent strikes. Threats to move out and shaking on deals then encouraging them to push for more. All because you thought it is best for CCFC. Seems you haven't got a clue what actually is best for CCFC and keep somehow suporting what is best for SISU and very...

thanks for putting it in bold. So i will take that as an acknowledgement that the legal action could adversely affect Wasps. So they will be unlikely to not take advantage of us needing to rent the Ricoh off them in order to stop that risk to them from the legal action. It really isn't a hard...

What is JR2?

Did you miss my question. Why do Wasps not want CCFC as tenants? Second question why do I need to justify anything to do with Wasps? I think the fans damaging the pitch isnithing compared to the damage already there. I think all Wasps decisions like this one will be like this in order to...

So why do they not want them as a tenant?

By law it can happen. If the decision by a public entity was unlawful. The judge has it in his power as a remedy to reverse the decision. However I also believe that us the most unlikely option. He could reverse the lease extension though. Then I imagine Wasps and SISU would be suing the...

Of course they would Notice has been served that the legal action is planned. Wasps will have sort legal advice on how it impacts them to be named as an interested party. They would have also sought legal actions on the possible outcomes. Separately they will have divised a plan of action for...

Not quite as extreme as that but a modification of terms and conditions of the lease that would adversely affect Wasps.

Do you believe Wasps have not paid lawyers to review what implications this legal action has for them? Do you believe that there are no remedy options available to the Judge if SISU won that could adversely affect them?

Straight away it will be costing them time money and effort reviewing it legally. In the future it presents a risk. If in the unlikely event SISU win. An unlikely remedy option for a judge is the contract length of the lease 40 years to 250 and the ability to reverse the decision by a public...

I assume Wasps are responsible in the contract for the damage to the pitch through matches and they are taking advantage of this to try to get Cov to pay up.

They give a shit about money thats all they give a shit about. The legal action threatens their money. If we are there as tenants giving them more money than we cost them or threaten to cost them. They would want us there it's simple business.

Why don't they want CCFC here?

He is a good bloke.