Search results

Glad to hear he filled in well today when needed - shown he can be considered adequate "cover" for Stokes which for league one squad is all we can really ask for. In his early career he did show signs of potential. Having said all that Stokes is clearly no1 for left back.......however...

Murphy, Tudguy & Armstrong all on at half time.........get tudguy on, get tudguy on!! Go on TM go for th jugular - triple sub gamble!

Otis would you not start Tudguy then and do you agree with Fortune getting much more game time than him given overall performances from both this season?

Well Marty I put Murphy up top - has worked well in past his season benched Armstrong and had JOB, Maddison & Lameiras in behind........I would like Tudguy to get a chance though.....will be interesting to see what TM goes for.

Poor old Tudguy he deserves a start imo!

Team for me though doubt TM will go for it! RCC GK Phillips RB Martin CB Ricketts CB Stokes LB Fleck DCM Vincelot DCM JOB ACM Maddison ACM Lameiras ACM Murphy ST Subs: Burge, Haynes, Bigi, Cole. Kent, Tudgay, Armstrong

Right I think the original point was we did very well to get the money that we did for him. Despite the outcry from many on here at the time I think that now all are in no doubt we did very well to get the money for him....similar to the outcry for Juke sale which I still will stick by was good...

Doh!! Sorry just seen options on the bench then definitely!

Who is on the bench job?

or Sandy Robertson

No-one this season in the three as a unit has come remotely close to JOB, Lameiras and Maddison at Millwall away. They would be my 3 midfielders and would consider dropping Armstrong tbh for either Murphy or Tudguy up top would probably give Armstrong another start though - Murphy and Tudguy on...

Is it unthinkable to drop Armstrong to the bench for Tudgay? I think Tudguy would do well against Port Vale personally.

Because he was crap probably!

Spot on assessment of Murphy.....I am playing devils advocate a bit would have him ahead of our two though RCC IMO has a lot of potential to be in the long run better than Murphy. The view experienced keepers dont make mistakes/errors of judgement is a huge fallacy though!

Murphy was not mistake free let us not forget....although many appear to have!

I think Vincelot & Cole are two very different types of players with different roles which make comparing them like for like almost impossible they have different jobs.......having played role Vincelot does can guarantee he does so much that general fans will not see to allow the forward players...

I agree I am a fan of Tudguy make no secret of that - would have him above Fortune,,,,,my point was both have had very good games where they have done little wrong and then they were ditched for following game.....I know they both are paid to stay professional but it must piss them of quite badly!