Search results

That would be a change.

They were, I think, his words.

Isn’t that the Problem though, the pendulum swings. Next time it may be Reform who can’t be blamed for any of that history.

Would have put up the additional rate of tax by 1% to 46% so he would have paid for it himself. And mine,

I don’t think it has diffused through yet.

Why would Los Angeles be paying for UK train drivers?

What about Rod Stewart?

Elton Fucking John, I wonder how much his tax bill is?

It was for Truss, wasn’t it?

True, but the £22bn fairytale was used as an excuse,

Is that Q2 calendar year 2024? I.e. before the election.

From the document you linked GDP: Muted economic growth momentum ahead Following a rebound at the start of the year, UK GDP growth is expected to have slowed again in the second half of 2024. and Labour market: Firms could see easier hiring and wage growth ahead

But the clusterfuck (a) shouldn’t have been a surprise and (b) wasn’t £22 bn according to the OBR.

I said “quite Well”

Most train drivers are in the private sector (for now) and have done quite well.

You were saying that they had a plan and have stuck to it. I’m pointing out something that wasn’t in the plan, and may have affected their vote had it been. Yes, I know older voters - those directly affected - don't tend to vote Labour but younger members of their families may have been...

Can you just remind me where in the manifesto they promised to stop Winter Fuel Payments for millions of Pensioners?

Or off the line.

They have certainly got a plan to review lots of stuff - is it 70 reviews? Thereby kicking the can down the road. Even you must admit they have hardly hit the ground running. Economic trends heading in the same direction as approval ratings - in the wrong direction. It really doesn’t seem as...