Search results

If they aren’t going to get the full benefit earned by their contributions, they ought to get a partial refund.

I have no idea what the rationale was. I was a baby at the time. It feels wrong to me because these people have made full qualifying contributions to the system. You are avoiding answering the question I posed to you by asking another question. So, to go back to my question to you. On what...

Yep. Just think of all the benefits of pensioners emigrating. Reduced pressure on NHS and social services. Additional housing stock released to the market. Can bring in an immigrant professional to fill key gaps in public services without increasing the population. Less boomers around to wind up...

Hmmm. Not sure anything could be too harsh for him. Blood on his hands methinks. Dodgy dossier. David Kelly.

What a bizarre take on it! They have made the qualifying contributions etc. And it isn't “kinda the deal” and shouldn’t be.

It has been the rule for 70 years. On what basis do you think it makes sense? They have made the same qualifying contributions as anyone else, but are not burdening the state with, for example, healthcare costs. It makes absolutely no sense to me whatsoever.

I thinks we are supposed to be angry at the principle of the frozen pensions, and the fact that Starmer is so tone deaf as to not agree to meet her if only for 10 minutes. To be fair to him, he probably is a bit busy as he has spent so much time in the air since he became PM.

You only have to look on the front of the packet.

It’s not even the children who buy the foods anyway. Im not sure Ozemoic stops tooth decay.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14156297/Keir-Starmer-war-veteran-pension.html What a c**t Starmer is. I guess shmmeee will be of the view that the rules are the rules, but It seems fucking ridiculous. What used to really piss me off was Polish plumbers claiming child benefit for...

I am sure it offends the very core of your being to open Daily Mail online, so this is a copy and paste ”The Government's new ultra-strict ban on junk food advertising has sparked outrage on social media, with many rallying against the 'confusing' rules that list foods like porridge, muesli and...

I bought some so called plain porridge oats this morning and just had to check. Surprisingly, 1% more sugars than in the sweetened variety. My muesli had even more, It’s the dried fruit that’s the problem with that.And I thought muesli was a healthier option😟

And the loft.

All this discussing milk stuff really follows on from the “we won’t tell you how to live your lives“ party suggesting banning porridge ads before 9pm. Haven't they got anything better to do?

You started it by posting the video😀 Normal service now resumed, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/dec/04/uk-interest-rates-to-fall-more-slowly-than-expected-after-budget-claims-report#:~:text=The%20OECD%20said%20on%20Wednesday,to%203.5%25%20by%20early%202026.

Thanks shmmeee. God know what I had read!

I think he was attempting to be funny. Im sure I read somehere that the production of these fake milks involves more CO2 than the real stuff.

It swerved so much it looked like it had taken a deflection. Which I don’t think it had.

It is the anti additive lobby. They don’t believe that this stuff doesn’t get in to the milk and the extremists think it’s part of a Bill Gates conspiracy to reduce the world’s population - which would also reduce CO2 emissions. Probably the same people who don’t believe In COVID or are / were...