Search results

Why not the indirect kick as stipulated in the rules?

Employment Rights Bill - not fit for purpose https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/employment-rights-bill-rpc-opinion-red-rated

I genuinely don’t remember. I voted Labour that year.

Surely the question is how can she still be in a job having falsified her cv?

Why does she need a subscription to The Economist? It’s not as if she is one.

It wasn’t always thus though, was it? Fixed Term Parliaments Act only came in in 2011 and presumably could be repealed. Unlikely admittedly. There is a requirement for a government response to this petition. I would imagine it will be along the lines of, fuck off plebs. If it is, I look...

That was very interesting actually. My NHS employers breached my contract of employment in 2006 at the behest of Gordon Brown. My union were useless.

I take it you agree that 52:48 IS the will of the people.

I doubt it, I think there were only a very few tractors as the police had advised them not to take them. Just someone being an arsehole, should get done for driving without due care and attention. Hopefully businesses affected can claim off the tractor driver’s insurance.

It was Souza I think, their number 21 and captain.

You're obviously an optimist. Most of the time they do fuck all after a crime has been committed - even if you have evidence. I mean, they will give you a crime number but that seems too be about it. Even when they have investigated, have good video evidence and submit it to the CPS nothing...

Typical.

Why free kicks against him?

It looked bad to me. It certainly could have warranted a red card.

Could do with some visible police presence to move them on.

It's about 5% now. With best part of 6 months to go. It would be entirely possible to end up with >20% by the time the petition closes. Im sure it is ultimately an irrelevance. The debate will be interesting - will Keir even be here and will he be dismissive in that really irritating way that...

It means, for example, not going back and renegotiating, not paying the EU any fees, not being subservient to the ECHR. The "spirit" was/ is, in my view, about being able to act as a sovereign nation. And obviously anything I don't agree with:)

6,103,056 signatories over the 6 months is the one I've just looked up. The consequent debate was lively! Including some debate about whether an MP had accused another one of being dishonest.

Great, you agree that there should have been no attempts to interfere with Brexit and Starmer should absolutely respect the result of the referendum - to the letter and in spirit. The pointless petition is up to 2,116,000 now.

26% is significantly more than 20%. Nowhere have I said I was happy for them to do pretty much what they wanted to. It could be argued that they weren't actually able to do what they wanted to.