Search results

I wouldn’t be surprise if the TV companies, especially Sky, complained. Must have played havoc with their scheduling. As if Sky hasn’t fucked the game up enough already!!

So, clear rules which cannot be misinterpreted with a clear sanction for breaches of the rules.

That’s not a rule, it is a process to enforce a rule. You don’t need to trial anything, just fucking do it. Teams will soon modify their behaviour. The indirect free kick which should be awarded will be more of a deterrent than a yellow car as there will never be a second yellow given for...

If they drop the ball to the floor they can be tackled. If they drop it on the floor having had it in control in their hands, it should be a penalty if they pick it back up again.

Entirely possible. Ridiculous none the less.

Should make it a penalty for controlling the ball with the hands for more than 6 seconds. No one can challenge the keepers these days, it’s a bookable offence to give them a dirty look these days. OK, a slight exaggeration but it seems like a dirty look is requiring medical treatment practically...

The law seems very clear. An indirect free kick WILL be awarded. What gives refs the right to pick and choose which rules to follow. This is an entirely objective matter, it is not open to interpretation like, say, a foul or penalty. They give offside for a toenail ffs. And then they wonder...

I would just like to hear Pep moaning about his players having to play the full time proscribed in the laws of the game. He was going on about his team playing twenty more games than the run of the mill Prem team. Don’t go on all these preseason jaunts / enter meaningless world club...

Well, we will just have to wait five years won’t we. I cant post retrospectively. Anyway, isn’t political motivation a valid enough reason?

From Gov UK When your claim might not be considered Your claim might not be considered if you: are from an EU country travelled to the UK through a ‘safe third country’ have a connection to a safe third country where you could claim asylum Generally, a safe third country is one that...

TBH shmmeee I’m not in the least bothered about other countries processes. If it all goes tits up genuine asylum seekers will just have to blame the gangs - perhaps they will smash them on Sir Kier’s behalf.

They are illegal immigrants who have been advised on the best way to claim asylum.

Hasn’t happened since 1940.

I wonder how much tourist spending London benefitted from?

There are legally proscribed routes to seeking asylum, arriving on a boat without papers is not one of them. You are technically correct, but the people coming in boats are illegal immigrants who are then claiming to be seeking asylum. They have arrived here from a safe country.

Hope not. Stop the watch and make them actually play for a full 90.

How come nothing was made of the shove on BTA after he’d had been wrongly booked,

Not much Sound of the Sky Blues there.

Ouch!

At least we got £15m for him.