Search results

Here he is. the bloke who said i know nothing. It is the same contract. You clearly don’t know business. In essence, ashley offered us the same contract short term to discuss a new contract going forward. Sisu decide not to sign. Now we are back to square one again.

how many fuckin times. Ashley offered us the same contract until the end of the season. The new contract probably will be different but instead sisu decided not to sign the contract and now we’re in a situation which means we could be playing in cov again

they’ve offered us the same contract short term to enable us to discuss an alternative contract post season. Sisu need to sign the contract and then negotiate after

It is the same deal. I was told this morning and seems the statement from Fraser group backs this up. As I said, sisu playing games as they always like to

you really don’t get it do you? Without CCFC signing the new agreement we are not tenants. Simple as that. Sisu playing games with our club. The deal is the same as before. So they need to sign it then discuss long term after.

why would ashley offer the new contract to 2031 without going through it all? They’ve offered us a short term contact similar to the one we are currently in. Sisu should sign the contract then play hardball after. At least keep us going at the cbs for the foreseeable. Instead they haven’t and...

if you don’t see why sisu made a big fuss the night before the court case then you need to open your eyes. Sisu trying to play another game as they always do and it always impacts the club in a negative way. Some fans will never wake up to the fact sisu are clowns who have no interest in CCFC

lol - are you for real? You like changing the goal posts to suit. You really are naive, in fact gullible that you believe sisu all the time. if you took the time to look further, you’ll see Fraser group have confirmed the new contract Mirrors the previous one as I said. you keep believing sisu...

the court date is the day they took over ownership.

are you really that naive? As it goes, don’t answer that

what? The court case was when ashley took over. Sisu knew full well ashley would get ownership. Why they decided to put a spanner in the works night before is anyone guess but it’s proving to look silly and as an intent of playing games as they always tend to do

Who knows what hoffman knows as he’s in Qatar with his son but as he’s not yet officially confirmed not sure how he can resign from a post he’s not in it yet?

i was told this morning that an agreement should be made this week. Ticket office were told BAU and it was ashley pushing sisu to sign the new contact. For me the statement from Cov is a PR stunt to keep fans onside. Hopefully they sign the contract to keep us going for the short term at least...

he’s not even on the board yet. the point still stands. Sisu admit in the statement they were in talks with ashley prior the court case. Why did they think it was a good idea at the 11th hour to bring DK into the equation and mention the ground? That annoyed ashley and his team. Sisu yet again...

i was told this would not happen. Ticket office informed business as usual

What part can’t you grasp? sisu playing silly games as per. Ashley is calling sisu bluff not signing the new agreement. puts pressure on sisu to sign it. If sisu sign the agreement then it’s sorted.

This is sisu we’re talking about. If after all these years believe they have the club interest heart then quite frankly you are deluded. if sisu have no wrong doing in this, why no statement as we know. They love making statements when they believe they are in the right. Before jumping to...

same thing. Nothing was transferred hence new agreement is required. What part can’t everyone grasp? Sisu need to sign the new agreement and as of yet. Have not

because the club knew full well ashley was getting the ground. club timing of the new ‘takeover’ was a parting shot at ashley. Why you so oblivious to that?