Search results

If the club and acl were united it'd surely load onto acl a whole load of liabilities that they aren't responsible for. Also to me, this 'investment' sisu have made isn't, they are loans, not the same.

Moussa was a robins signing also. Granted last year he blew hot and cold, but this year has been class..down to Pressley getting best out of him consistently

Please correct me if I'm wrong but couldn't this 'tidying up' have happened without the admin and all the legal wrangles, which effectively stitched acl up? Especially essing as the structure is exactly as it was before...just proves what this was all about doesn't it, and it wasn't rent

Do you not think though than rather than withholding rent, and without slagging off council at every opportunity, or getting personal with stuff, or without the legal action, or without the admin process and everything that went with it, this could have been done long ago without the animosity...

Doesn't mean anything though. Seppala won't pay market value for it....CCC shouldn't be forced into a sale of anything by anyone, including ccfc

Can someone please explain or clarify something to me. CCC own the freehold of the land on which the Ricoh stands.. ACL own the leasehold of the ricoh itself... If SISU were to 'obtain' the freehold, what does this mean? Am i right in thinking that they could do what the hell they liked with...

As humorous as it is it is probably as close to the truth as you will ever get from the cretins running the club. An excellent thread!!

Exactly my point as well they didn't want to ground share, threatened it and had to go through with it as ACL wouldn't budge. I agree with you

Sooner or later sisu are going to have to follow through with the building of this new stadium, like they did with the ground share, just to try and save face. I would imagine despite their want to have CCFC back there, ACL wouldn't have a problem with them building there own ground. As...

Sorry I've re-read it properly now....

So we should be grateful to sisu and hate our council and fellow coventrians that work at acl? Give me a break.

Expect the usual shite to come back in retaliation from fisher and co. Just to clear something up as well, when fisher goes on about 'real decision makers' who have power to do things at the meetings they've had, the acl/CCC personnel that have been there had the power to talk/negotiate a rent...

Even if it was the last game of the season and promotion depended on it, I still wouldn't go. I do think though if we draw say man utd at home in fa cup it would be interesting to see the crowd numbers. Games like that will test the resolve of some

Which is precisely the problem, acl move significantly, sisu move the goalposts, as happened in the infamous 29th January 'shaking hands' meeting. New rent terms were agreed, when sisu emailed back with the contract written up it was completely different to what was agreed at meeting.

Acl's actions have been a disgrace? Really? Relative to what/who? Think fisher/sisu take a lot of beating to be fair.

Making it up as they go along...something you do when you haven't got a clue. It only benefits sisu/Otium...wonder why that is?

Conferences and exhibitions on a weekly if not daily basis.

The 'pies and drinks' are a metaphor for everything else. (Can I get away with that) Let's take the £1m profit acl accounts last showed....I still don't think an extra million would make the difference....and that was based on average crowds in region of 14k? They've lost too many paying...

The only way they'll ever get their investment back is by promotion to premiership and staying there....can anyone realistically see this happening anytime soon under their stewardship? Getting an extra 100k a year from pies and drinks won't get them their money back.

Interesting to see whose pensions she's gambling with in the hope CCFC one day make a return?