Search results

The way they've gone about this is nothing short of disgusting

Which is why I'd be disgusted if sisu owned the Ricoh. I've said before CCFC should at some point be able to own some or all of it (let's not forget they couldn't afford to build it so have no divine right to it), but no way should they if sisu are the owners.

Because council taxpayers money paid for the Ricoh to be built? It's our stadium. The point I'm making is Not saying we'd lose out but that she doesn't give a toss about anyone in coventry, just her precious investors. Same could be said for worth of the Ricoh, but I'm pretty sure even...

A house is only worth as much as someone is prepared to pay for it, regardless of what's been spent on it. Who on earth would pay enough money for CCFC so that sisu get their investment back? She's living in her own little world where no-one else, particularly coventry fans or council...

So none of the statements they've put out themselves have ever twisted things to make acl or the council look bad? Pots and kettles. Don't trust her. The new stadium won't happen because they want the Ricoh but can't get it. Otherwise building a new shed stadium is counterproductive and...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/coventry_city/7139107.stm

Look back on the statement when they took over and it clearly says sisu have signed an agreement for continued use of the Ricoh arena...

OSB58...I agree they don't have to own it...it's about maximising the revenues they get from being anchor tenant, but as we know CCFC couldn't afford to build it themselves so signed away the rights to this long ago, in any other business they wouldn't be expected to be given it back for...

My issue is sisu have no intention of going back to the Ricoh, at least as tenants. They only want to buy it, and the thought of them owning our stadium after their tactics/behaviour in this affair makes me feel sick.

All she'll spout is the same propaganda she gave Nikki Sinclair...we want to be in cov etc. All bollocks, she doesn't give a toss

Nothing against the charity, it appears to be a fine one, but as the above post, why mention cbre and the relocation...,

So a company that sisu have employed to help facilitate moving the club away from the Ricoh is now effectively sponsoring them....unbelievable. May as well have sisu on the shirts

Where in my post did I say that I wasn't happy with the sponsor being a charity? I have no problem with it. I have a problem with that scumbag fisher continually lying to us about stuff.

So there was no shirt sponsor awaiting to be announced then... A charity it is, which was suggested by fans was it not? Another lie from Tim Fibber

Funny how an admin process that basically screwed acl ended up with the club companies being 'united'....could easily have been done at anytime since 2007. Funny how accounts haven't been filed that would show when the transfer of players happened. Funny how PA sold assets apart from the...

The main players on the board of acl ARE cov fans...and a lot of people who work there grew up in coventry and support them.. CCFC's board however...

Oh and a lot of people who work for acl and council are not only football fans but CCFC fans....had this not been the case they would not have been able to complete last season at the Ricoh...

Because they didn't agree with it? why agree and sign something you have fundamental issues with. It's like signing divorce papers for adultery when you did no such thing, by signing it you're agreeing to it. Like going to sixfields some say legitimises what has happened.

So acting the way they have is conducive to positive talks with acl over the 50% option? Could have been so different, but they chose to act disgracefully.

F&b ain't the answer and not the real stumbling block. Selling tickets would get more revenue.