Search results

Good report as usual but it must have (or 'of' for some people) been a long walk if you started off trudging the streets of north London :-)

Sounded like "1 nil down and still singing" to me.

Thought this 'light years ahead' claim was worth bumping. His brain turns to mush when he has the ball at his feet.

I think Shipley answered the OP's question perfectly with that performance tonight.

L Let it go!

I didnt want to go to Wembley again anyway! It gets boring - lol

Not sure how Saturday, Tuesday, Saturday is 3 games in a week.

Can't believe he didnt tip it over the bar!

But he is 'light years' ahead of Max - apparently. Lol. I'd be embarrassed if I claimed that.

..or a member of Dollar.

..was it H?

You're right actually. Neither contribute enough, which brings us back to my question about do we need someone else to partner Chaplin?

Cheers STP. Forgot that one.

ok, so you are obviously counting coming on as sub in Max's 49 appearances last season, and you are saying 3 of his 9 goals were in the box. I can't remember them all so I'll take your word on that. By the same token, JCH made 22 appearances last season and scored 4, one of which was a penalty...

I still prefer Davies to Hyam to be honest. I'd be happier with a Willis/Davies partnership, although Hyam is a more than adequate back up. Good that we have 3 decent central defenders.

Although today was one of his better games, I still don't think JCH has got many goals in him. He is never in goalscoring position , in fact he is rarely in the 18 yard box at all. I think if he played every game this season, he won't score more than 6 or 7. What does he bring to the team that...

Agreed. I break out into a cold sweat each time we concede a corner.

Statements where 'of' have been used instead of 'have' have to be disregarded. :-)

Of course a win would be great. It doesn't even need saying (is my point).

Why would it?