15th Biggest Club in England* (1 Viewer)

Forums New posts
pusbccfc

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
Last edited:
torchomatic

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
It's the * that I'm interested in.
 
Covstu

Covstu

Well-Known Member
Coventry City may be in League One but rank 15th in the Ultimate League. They enjoyed sustained top-flight status between 1967/68 to 2000/01 but are now the biggest underachievers among the top 20, sitting 17th in League One, 46 places below their Ultimate League ranking.

Ouch!

Did we ever achieve 15th in the top league anyway!! :)
 
albatross

albatross

Well-Known Member
[h=2]"New study claims that the Sky Blues are the biggest underachievers in the Football League over the past 50 years"[/h]
the most successful at underachieving ...... Feking Great
 
duffer

duffer

Well-Known Member
albatross said:
"New study claims that the Sky Blues are the biggest underachievers in the Football League over the past 50 years"


the most successful at underachieving ...... Feking Great
Click to expand...

Bloody hell, we've finally won something and there are still people here complaining. :)
 
M&B Stand

M&B Stand

Well-Known Member
Back around the time of the World Cup in Germany 2006 the englandfans club (formerly the England Members Club) had 25,000 members and a waiting list. When you applied you had to state the club side you followed. They produced a league table of teams followed, We were 18th most poplar amongst England members. I know it's not scientific, but it was a pretty decent guide to the size of clubs (or at least their followings) in the list. United were top Liverpool second.
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
matesx said:
yeah cheers for selling HR, getting us relegated from the Prem and leaving us £60m in debt.
Click to expand...

Yeah those heroes took us on, financial and real estate experts with super deep pockets allegedly?
 
SlowerThanPlatt

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
M&B Stand said:
Back around the time of the World Cup in Germany 2006 the englandfans club (formerly the England Members Club) had 25,000 members and a waiting list. When you applied you had to state the club side you followed. They produced a league table of teams followed, We were 18th most poplar amongst England members. I know it's not scientific, but it was a pretty decent guide to the size of clubs (or at least their followings) in the list. United were top Liverpool second.
Click to expand...

Anywhere I'd be able to find this?
 
letsallsingtogether

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Nick said:
Bastards for letting us drop out of the Premier League :(
Click to expand...

Shouldn't that read Bastards for not getting us back or even giving us a top six finish in the third tier of football???
 
stupot07

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Possibly the most flawed "biggest club" study I've ever seen. We rarely finished as high as 15th when we were in the PL. If we're looking at the last 50 years how are we above Derby who won 2 division one titles and have been promoted to the PL a few times in the last 10 or so years and have a bigger fanbase than us? Odd.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 
italiahorse

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
stupot07 said:
Possibly the most flawed "biggest club" study I've ever seen. We rarely finished as high as 15th when we were in the PL. If we're looking at the last 50 years how are we above Derby who won 2 division one titles and have been promoted to the PL a few times in the last 10 or so years and have a bigger fanbase than us? Odd.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
Click to expand...

Derby have been out the PL for about 25 seasons since 1967. We are about half that.
 
SkyBlue_Bear83

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
stupot07 said:
Possibly the most flawed "biggest club" study I've ever seen. We rarely finished as high as 15th when we were in the PL. If we're looking at the last 50 years how are we above Derby who won 2 division one titles and have been promoted to the PL a few times in the last 10 or so years and have a bigger fanbase than us? Odd.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
Click to expand...
15th isn't our average position, its our rank based on an average position of 22.2. Basically this list will just tell you who spent the most time in the premier league/top flight over the last 50 years
 
Gazolba

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
Covstu said:
Did we ever achieve 15th in the top league anyway!! :)
Click to expand...

Of course we did! I think our best position was 6th or maybe 7th.
 
Astute

Astute

Well-Known Member
matesx said:
thanks to SISU we have a club
Click to expand...

Thanks to SISU we have an extra Rugger club that we can watch :eek:

Thanks to SISU we are one step from being homeless.

Are you saying that without SISU we wouldn't have a club? :thinking about:
 
chiefdave

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Hobo said:
ah, the only show in town concept....now that really has been our undoing!
Click to expand...

SISU weren't the only show in town. I know of at least 2 other interested parties at the time KPMG were running through the administration process (it was administration in all but name). Unfortunately both of them identified that ownership of the Ricoh was crucial and walked away when it became clear CCC were not prepared to sell. We ended up with SISU as CCC effectively blocked the other interested parties.
 
oldskyblue58

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
As they say you can make stats say all sorts of things. Especially when you restrict data on an arbitrary basis. It isn't really the proof of size

All largely irrelevant isn't it though. Where we are now and where we take from here is the important thing isn't it? Outwardly we are an under achieving club with potential but with few assets on the pitch and none of note off it, massive debts and loss making, and a disconnected fan base are we really 15th biggest club in the country?

Wonder what a measure of say turnover would place us, or losses, or wages or crowds etc :thinking about:
 
pusbccfc

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
oldskyblue58 said:
As they say you can make stats say all sorts of things. Especially when you restrict data on an arbitrary basis. It isn't really the proof of size

All largely irrelevant isn't it though. Where we are now and where we take from here is the important thing isn't it? Outwardly we are an under achieving club with potential but with few assets on the pitch and none of note off it, massive debts and loss making, and a disconnected fan base are we really 15th biggest club in the country?

Wonder what a measure of say turnover would place us, or losses, or wages or crowds etc :thinking about:
Click to expand...

A lot of them were included in the Daily Mail one and they put us something like 50th.
 
Hobo

Hobo

Well-Known Member
chiefdave said:
SISU weren't the only show in town. I know of at least 2 other interested parties at the time KPMG were running through the administration process (it was administration in all but name). Unfortunately both of them identified that ownership of the Ricoh was crucial and walked away when it became clear CCC were not prepared to sell. We ended up with SISU as CCC effectively blocked the other interested parties.
Click to expand...

I don't think you understood my post did you?
 
Covstu

Covstu

Well-Known Member
oldskyblue58 said:
As they say you can make stats say all sorts of things. Especially when you restrict data on an arbitrary basis. It isn't really the proof of size

All largely irrelevant isn't it though. Where we are now and where we take from here is the important thing isn't it? Outwardly we are an under achieving club with potential but with few assets on the pitch and none of note off it, massive debts and loss making, and a disconnected fan base are we really 15th biggest club in the country?

Wonder what a measure of say turnover would place us, or losses, or wages or crowds etc :thinking about:
Click to expand...

Hmm indeed, personally i dont care about the history its about where we are now and the prospects of where we can move to. This is the major concern and the mountain the climb!
 
pusbccfc

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
I love the argument about without SISU we wouldn't have a club...

In the time they have been here we could have reformed and be close to where we are now. Instead of being on the way down, we would be looking up... Look at AFC Wimbledon. It only took them 10 years to get back to the football league.
 
Nick

Nick

Administrator
pusbccfc said:
I love the argument about without SISU we wouldn't have a club...

In the time they have been here we could have reformed and be close to where we are now. Instead of being on the way down, we would be looking up... Look at AFC Wimbledon. It only took them 10 years to get back to the football league.
Click to expand...

That would be a different club would it not?
 
H

Hugh Jarse

Well-Known Member
but are now the biggest underachievers among the top 20, sitting 17th in League One, 46 places below their Ultimate League ranking.
Click to expand...

You can't lay the blame for this on SISU (oh, how it would be great if we could), we have consistently played badly over a number of seasons to achieve this accolade, plain and simple. God forbid we drop into Division 2:whistle:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top