Was more concerned with the younger bloke. The older guy got 2 years in prison, but the younger bloke got a suspended sentence, despite the fact he was complicit in a father raping his own son, through his encouragment for the father to carry out the act.That was hard to watch but interesting to hear the comments of the police on what a drain the vigilantes are on their resources and how their actions can lead to cases being thrown out of court.
The sentences those two got seemed way too low to me. The older guy seemed like he might not be all there but obviously with the seriousness of the crimes they focused on the younger guy. With what they were describing I can't see any way the sentence is even close to correct.
I missed a couple of bits in that program. How did they catch the bloke for the 2 old cases? I assume it was DNA, but what led the police to him? Similarly, it was (I think) DNA that led the police to the young bloke who, as I understand it, had never been in trouble before. So why did the police have his DNA on file?
One of them looked absolutely amazed when they said he was being charged with murder. What did he think was going to happen?The gimpy white boys getting arrested "I'd slap you bruv". Drag him round the back and kick 10 bags of shit out the prick
The one who was stabbing him, giving it loads to the police. No respect or worries about killing somebody.One of them looked absolutely amazed when they said he was being charged with murder. What did he think was going to happen?
Ferral, they need putting down at birthTerrible cctv stuff. What’s wrong with them
Do you believe that? From birth you can tell?Ferral, they need putting down at birth
Some you can based on parentsDo you believe that? From birth you can tell?
The copper had no idea about the case. Both him and his lawyer knew from the off.The one tonight was about a big time Scouser drug dealer. Guilty as Hell but gave it the no comment all the time. Ended up with a soft sentence. The bloke was 54 but a copper who was ironically his cousin said he'll always be at it.
I need to stop watching the bit where they tell you the sentences.The one tonight was about a big time Scouser drug dealer. Guilty as Hell but gave it the no comment all the time. Ended up with a soft sentence. The bloke was 54 but a copper who was ironically his cousin said he'll always be at it.
I once got 2 years for a pub brawl. My solicitor said I'd get probation !I need to stop watching the bit where they tell you the sentences.
Imported £2.5m of drugs, been jailed for it before yet only got 25 months, will be out i a year.
Should have imported drugs, you'd be able to buy the club off SISU by now.I once got 2 years for a pub brawl. My solicitor said I'd get probation !
What’s the no comment nonsense??Some you can based on parents
Can you imagine the people stabbing on that episode and their kids?
They are told to by their lawyersWhat’s the no comment nonsense??
It’s a moral not a legal thing though isn’t it?They are told to by their lawyers
Tbh they couldn't pin all 2.5m on him only the draw which was 400k I think. The programme missed a lot of relevant detail I thought.I need to stop watching the bit where they tell you the sentences.
Imported £2.5m of drugs, been jailed for it before yet only got 25 months, will be out i a year.
Fucking hell, that's harsh.I once got 2 years for a pub brawl. My solicitor said I'd get probation !
The no comment thing does my head in, how the police sit there and take it I don't know.This no comment thing. Years ago if you said nothing in a police interview, that meant you were guilty. This is a fairly new concept I think ? Myself I just went guilty straight away as I was ! What's the point of stretching it out, but I was of the mindset if you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
It appears it was in those casesThe no comment thing does my head in, how the police sit there and take it I don't know.
Should be illegal to just sit there and no comment everything, or be taken as an admission of guilt.
Hmm. Someone I knew got two and a half years for a similar crime. Am guessing the images found were rather worse than he made out...Fucking hell, that's harsh.
Bloke I worked with got done for having 800 images of kids on his computer. Half of them were category A.
Didn't even get sent down. He got 4 months suspended for 2 years, and some community service. Cretin.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?