If it's a short term deal similar to what has gone before, I can't see why it's taking so longIt’s been suggested a short term agreement for now similar to what we currently have, followed by more detailed discussion for a long term agreement. I think the EFL require ten year plans re grounds, if so I suspect they will want a “proper” deal to be in place this time next year, or don’t laugh a new ground being built.
My thoughts exactly. I am getting a bit twitchy about it nowIf it's a short term deal similar to what has gone before, I can't see why it's taking so long
There must be more to it.
If it's a short term deal similar to what has gone before, I can't see why it's taking so long
There must be more to it.
It’s in their rules. After Northampton we had a 2+2 year agreement which has just ended. I’m sure the EFL are flexible to a point but It’s in everyone’s benefit to have a long term agreement surely. We can’t be going through this farce re where we play every twelve months.
It’s in their rules. After Northampton we had a 2+2 year agreement which has just ended. I’m sure the EFL are flexible to a point but It’s in everyone’s benefit to have a long term agreement surely. We can’t be going through this farce re where we play every twelve months.
How immatureIt isn’t their rules. I suspect you’ve had this rule told to you by Hoffman or one if his cronies who’ve told you that he can get a 10 year deal and that will keep the club alive
How immature
Dripping with ironyJust block and move on with your life mate. Dementia is not being kind to him.
Just block and move on with your life mate. Dementia is not being kind to him.
Just block and move on with your life mate. Dementia is not being kind to him.
I've been of the same opinion of this poster for some years. He/she only offers criticism and never anything constructive. One of the reasons I don't visit this forum too often - too much bickering and very little constructive comment.
Anxious to find out if a Ricoh deal has been done yet, I dipped into this thread only to find fans bickering with each other. WTF.
I've been of the same opinion of this poster for some years. He/she only offers criticism and never anything constructive. One of the reasons I don't visit this forum too often - too much bickering and very little constructive comment.
Anxious to find out if a Ricoh deal has been done yet, I dipped into this thread only to find fans bickering with each other. WTF.
When your on this forum long enough you just get used to the bickering from the usual's
No you don’t
There's no moderation on here; just a clique that's hostile and dismissive. When that clique includes the Admin(s) you're in trouble. It will drive folks away. I've seen it with other types of forum.
I'm dismissed as a Wasps apologist by folks because it suits their position. That doesn't encourage debate and it's the opposite of what an Admin or Moderator's role should be.
See your priorities thread. The clique you mention are ccfc fans,, surprising on a ccfc forum.There's no moderation on here; just a clique that's hostile and dismissive. When that clique includes the Admin(s) you're in trouble. It will drive folks away. I've seen it with other types of forum.
I'm dismissed as a Wasps apologist by folks because it suits their position. That doesn't encourage debate and it's the opposite of what an Admin or Moderator's role should be.
Try the Wasps forum. They could probably do with the clicks tbh.There's no moderation on here; just a clique that's hostile and dismissive. When that clique includes the Admin(s) you're in trouble. It will drive folks away. I've seen it with other types of forum.
I'm dismissed as a Wasps apologist by folks because it suits their position. That doesn't encourage debate and it's the opposite of what an Admin or Moderator's role should be.
I'll stand by everything I've said and asked. Blaming other parties is easier than admitting the club you support has been run into the ground by successive owners which is the chief reason for its plight.
Same as dismissing or discrediting things I post based on an assertion that I have a particular agenda. Saves you having to make a counter argument or discuss the point in hand objectively.
Having people take that approach on a public forum is fine. That's life. Having someone that runs the forum doing that sets a sh*tty tone and discourages folks from getting involved.
Really?Because a Wasps 'Plant' would have a picture of Phil Babb as their avatar. Get a f*cking grip!
...who doesn't bother with ccfc.
Not half as divisive as some of the crap you have tried to push.If you can't see how divisive this kind of sh*t is then you're beyond help. Also no way you'd say anything like that to someone in person which makes it twice as pathetic. F*ck this place.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?