Londonccfcfan
Well-Known Member
Think there's no option but 5 at the back now till next season.
Both formations have 2 deep & 1 advanced in midfield.midfield is weak as it is and you want to expose it even more
If we don’t want to create another chance, we have options, the 5 one though has created nothing when we have played it this yearThink there's no option but 5 at the back now till next season.
We have no wingers nowDid we not abandon this because it wasn't working? Injury asside we've climbed the league since going with 4
We have no option to 4 at the back.We've looked so poor and toothless when we've played 352 or 3421 this season. It worked previously two seasons because we had Gyokeres and Hamer. And also Allen making runs from midfield, when we played the box. Playing It with two upfront rarely worked and we got otherrun in midfield, and if you play 1 up and the box, you can't have both O'Hare and Palmer, as you need someone making those third man runs.
We should have another look at Tavares, and also MVE in the Saka role before we throw out the 4231 which has been the main reason for our up turn.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Could we push mve forward into that Saka role?!
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
We have no option to 4 at the back.
MVE is knackered needs a break and won't last either. We have no natural right hand side width wether it's Right back or right winger.
We can still play the box and use palmer/ohare top of the box.Wouldn't be surprised to see us go 5 at the back again given we have no right winger now other than Tavares.
If we do want to stick with 4 at the back then when Sheaf returns we could go 433 rather than 4231 so we've got one less attacking player to field, though it means playing one of O'Hare/Palmer on the right.
You won't have the runners going in behind. They both want to play as a 10. Allen did that so effectively, and Shipley did too in league one. Otherwise your striker gets isolated.We can still play the box and use palmer/ohare top of the box.
We recruited for a 352 which didn't work.Are we allowed to question the recruitment strategy now that the squad has no natural wingers in a year when 433 has been the only formation that wins us games? Or is that still “fan cope”?
Agree but would swap Kelly for palmerThomas, Binks, kitching
Mve.........................Bidwell
Eccles, torp
Ohare, Palmer
Simms/Wright
I like this for the big games, should make us harder to score against and Palmer and Ohare can create for Simms or Wright.Thomas, Binks, kitching
Mve.........................Bidwell
Eccles, torp
Ohare, Palmer
Simms/Wright
Can anyone explain why we’d go to 5 at the back? We were in 20th place when we abandoned it because it doesn’t work.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?