5pm Tweet (4 Viewers)

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
I'd imagine that at least some of the targets might be very different. That's been my take on the delay in signings anyway
Yep I think it’s bollox about waiting but I do need a good answer as to the delay in any more than Mr Dasilva
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
I've just heard that there is no money until Vik is sold and the Executive Chairman isn't willing to front anything up while the sale goes through

Like I said on another thread, this makes no sense at all as it implies that if Vik is not sold for whatever reason, we would be buying no players at all in this window.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
That statement is likely true though isn't it? Our whole transfer strategy is based on selling him for a big fee.
Which means we’re in for an excellent transfer window next season
Season 3 Whatever GIF by The Office
 

Robinshio

Well-Known Member
to an extent he is correct
if we didnt sell Vik, there would be players incoming, but they would be very different players

so of course we would do business but would be only loans and free transfers / minimal fees
The Vik money gives us much more strength in the window

I am not an itk as such but the above is correct
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
to an extent he is correct
if we didnt sell Vik, there would be players incoming, but they would be very different players

so of course we would do business but would be only loans and free transfers / minimal fees
The Vik money gives us much more strength in the window

I am not an itk as such but the above is correct
You’ve heard that or it’s correct in that it seems obvious to you?
 

Samo

Well-Known Member
That statement is likely true though isn't it? Our whole transfer strategy is based on selling him for a big fee.

That would seem to suggest that King only bought the club because there was a 20m asset to sell. And if that's true we are indeed fucked.
 

djr8369

Well-Known Member
As bad as it sounds you wouldn’t try and scrape a few million together if you thought you’d get 20 million in a few days.
 

Speedie's Head

Well-Known Member
to an extent he is correct
if we didnt sell Vik, there would be players incoming, but they would be very different players

so of course we would do business but would be only loans and free transfers / minimal fees
The Vik money gives us much more strength in the window

I am not an itk as such but the above is correct
The are also frees and 'frees'. Some have a big signing off fees attached. Maybe those targets are different too...
 

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
Dunno what is so hard for people to understand?

We need to wait for the money from the sale of Vik to know what our budget is. Doesn't mean there wouldn't be a budget if the sale collapsed though. It would be considerably smaller yes but there will be a budget for every scenario.

Absolutely no point making filler buys now when we could pool the total budget and buy some quality a little later in the window. It will come together, I'm 100% sure of it.
 

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
I've just heard that there is no money until Vik is sold and the Executive Chairman isn't willing to front anything up while the sale goes through


So if Gyokores isn't sold, we can't sign permanent players then ?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top