Are you sure it's all down to the way we play and the opposition working us out though? Burton have had the same method all season and has not done them any harm. What I see is a loss of form. Players not producing their best games as they were earlier. Changing the way we play is also a big risk. I don't think we have the right pedigree of players in the squad to change things dramatically. Henderson or Tudgay up top approach means you are asking players who have barely shown themselves match ready to make a difference. I think we can tinker with the current teams approach and tactics slightly such as bringing Fleck much more forward and put Rose in the defensive role. make sure the wing backs are producing crosses into the box. At this level it can be reasoned we don't need a big lump up top but pace and quick feet such as Arma getting to those panicked defenders. To play the big lump up top will mean changing the whole system of our play with just a dozen games left and I just don't think we have the players to adapt to it.
Yes! Am positive it's down to the way we play. You only need to go up to the games and watch us.
1. We rarely get good balls in from the flanks and for the most part try and play our way through teams straight down the middle. We do pass the ball out wide to Stokes, but it invariably comes straight back inside again. Teams know how we play and crowd the centre field out.
2. Armstrong isn't out of form, we are just not supporting him enough. Feed him in good positions and he will score.
3. Teams are double marking Armstrong, sometimes triple marking him.
4. Yes, Murphy is out of form, but opposition teams and now being much more physical with him and Maddison and Lameiras.
I would say Stokes and Vincelot and Armstrong all pretty much still in the same form, apart from the odd game here and there. Cole is consistently putting in the same sorts of performances (be that good or bad, but no change).
For me the two players badly out of form are Ricketts and Murphy and that's about it. To what degree Murphy is out of form and to what degree it is teams nullifying him I am not too sure.
5. Teams have countered the way we play and set out to nullify us. This has worked.
6. We always play from the back. Many teams now press us high up the pitch and stop us from playing the way we want to play.
7. As we play Armstrong as a loan single striker we have no aerial threat at all. Any long high balls are swallowed up by the opposition. This then leads us into having to keep playing as per point no. 6 and the balls from the back, because there is nothing else. This is then a catch 22 scenario.
8. When we are closed down quickly and harried our passing game tends to go astray.
9. Teams know Ricketts isn't the quickest, so target our right flank as a position to get some joy from.
Seems totally clear to me that this is just not us 'out of form' but that of teams studying our game plan and countering that, to which we are struggling to find an answer
Let's not confuse Armstrong's quiet games with him being out of form. It's just us not getting the ball to him, or supporting him.
On Saturday we left him alone in the box 3 times when we were on the attack.