Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Damn straight. You’d have thought 100% of supporters could or should unite behind that
Damn straight. You’d have thought 100% of supporters could or should unite behind thatwe need to be back in Cov. Staying away is playing Russian roulette with our future and our existence.
Agree about the terms, they need to drop the indemnity demand but other than that we should be actively pursuing a return. Not going to happen this year but it really needs to happen next, I'm fearful of what will happen otherwise.
Peanuts then.Allegedly £100k plus some other costs
Peanuts then.
When the club does return though we need to have some kind of clause in the contract that that pitch needs to be in pristine condition.
Yep that’s absolutely right. Somewhere between 100k and 800k but what is without doubt is that we would have gained financially being there as opposed to being at St. Andrews. For this season I meanNo one actually knows what the charge was going to be this season - it would have been considerably higher as Wasos were still then tied into the original deal
The only way of taking advantage of that extra income would be to have signed up to something that could potentially bust the club.Yep that’s absolutely right. Somewhere between 100k and 800k but what is without doubt is that we would have gained financially being there as opposed to being at St. Andrews. For this season I mean
That seems to be the case doesn’t itThe only way of taking advantage of that extra income would be to have signed up to something that could potentially bust the club.
“Seems” being the word that is often used in these debates.That seems to be the case doesn’t it
“Seems” being the word that is often used in these debates.
Truth is nobody knows exact figures/details although some on here believe they do.
Although because no one is willing to pressurise wasps we don’t know whether this is the reason or not and the non disclosure agreement means wasps Sisu and ccfc just don’t answer why we are where we are atI don’t really think the indemnity clause is an issue of debate. Both sides acknowledge its existence
If it wasn't the case Wasps would just say as it puts all the pressure back on Sisu. If you don't believe it you're living with your head in the sand.“Seems” being the word that is often used in these debates.
Truth is nobody knows exact figures/details although some on here believe they do.
Seeing is believing isn’t it? I don’t believe any of the waffle from any of them as they will put out what best suits them all. If you want to buy any of it that’s yours business.If it wasn't the case Wasps would just say as it puts all the pressure back on Sisu. If you don't believe it you're living with your head in the sand.
I know it's hard to believe, I can barely myselfNo offence, but really ?
we won’t go home and double our attendances due to the pitch ?. This coming from the team who won 4~1 on the worst pitch I have seen us play on in years only last week.
he's part of ontium entertainment group
I know it's hard to believe, I can barely myself
Only passing on m8 couldn't tell youSurely that isn't true, if that is the case regarding the pitch then im baffled! Why would they miss out on double the amount of tickets because of a pitch.... it can be worked on!
he's part of ontium entertainment group
Ha....I think the 'board' in question is an advertising board and the 'mate' is a steward.
I literally said that
And what you’re doing is telling everyone on the most frequented CCFC forum?
I don’t think it’d take Columbo for anyone at the club to work out who your “mate” is
Read itYou said we only put the next 6 games on sale?
Read it
Next paragraph, or the one after“We renew at St Andrews every 6 games, meaning that we only put the next 6 games on sale in case we return.”
This isn’t the case
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?